[issue14728] trace function not set, causing some Pdb commands to fail

Changes by Andrew Svetlov : -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pyth

[issue14728] trace function not set, causing some Pdb commands to fail

Xavier de Gaye added the comment: See also how this is fixed at http://code.google.com/p/pdb-clone/source/detail?r=4a6d8f2515eed16347d2e2c304e1942585427d50 -- ___ Python tracker

[issue14728] trace function not set, causing some Pdb commands to fail

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Since this pdb issue is a continuation of #13183 and repeals a part of that issue's patch, I nosy'ed the contributors to that issue. -- nosy: +georg.brandl, loewis, neologix, orsenthil, terry.reedy stage: -> patch review _

[issue14728] trace function not set, causing some Pdb commands to fail

Xavier de Gaye added the comment: Uploaded pdb_2.7.patch that applies on the 2.7 branch. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25464/pdb_2.7.patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue14728] trace function not set, causing some Pdb commands to fail

Xavier de Gaye added the comment: Uploaded pdb_default.patch that applies on the default branch with minor changes to the initial pdb.patch. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25463/pdb_default.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue14728] trace function not set, causing some Pdb commands to fail

New submission from Xavier de Gaye : The issue 13183 raises the problem that when the trace function is not set in the caller frame, the step command fails at a return statement. This new issue raises the point that, for the same reason: * the next, until and return statements fail also at