Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 2776ccf003cc by Georg Brandl in branch '3.2':
Closes #14545: make clearer what was added.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2776ccf003cc
New changeset f5f8a7fd881c by Georg Brandl in branch 'default':
#14545: merge 3.2
http://hg.python.org/cpython/r
Georg Brandl added the comment:
The comment that "html" was a package was not meant as a correction, but as an
explanation why it already exists previous to its status as an official
"module" in 3.2. No correction to "package"is needed.
--
___
Pyth
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Ezio, I appreciate the suggestion/tip. Thanks.
Regarding Georg's clarification that '"html" is a package,' I don't know if
that was intended to correct my comment, Ezio's comment, the docs, or all of
the above. In any case, that point should also be correct
Georg Brandl added the comment:
"html" is a package. The "html.parser" module, which was already in 3.0, cannot
be importable without a "html" package, so in all 3.x versions there was at
least an empty html/__init__.py.
That said, I have no objection to Ezio's suggestion.
--
nosy: +
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
The doc for the html module was added in 5633af590057 (see #2830) and it was
previously undocumented even if it was importable. Moving the versionadded
under html.escape sounds good to me.
As a side note, it would be better to do
try:
# Python 3.2 depreca
New submission from Chris Jerdonek :
The Python documentation says that the html module (defining html.escape()) is
new in Python 3.2:
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/html.html
However, it's importable in Python 3.1, but without the escape() function.
See below for evidence.
This preven
