[issue1454] Generators break trace functionality

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Thanks anyway! -- resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed superseder: -> pdb bug with "with" statement __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ _

[issue1454] Generators break trace functionality

Aldo Cortesi added the comment: Drat, you're right. This was fixed a few days ago by Amaury in http://svn.python.org/view?rev=58963&view=rev Another example of confluence - this bug has existed for a very long time. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue1454] Generators break trace functionality

Guido van Rossum added the comment: I think this was fixed in svn this week! See issue 1265. Let me know if your issue is different. -- nosy: +gvanrossum __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue1454] Generators break trace functionality

New submission from Aldo Cortesi: I rely heavily on a code coverage analysis engine I developed, and a bug in Python's trace functionality has been bothering me for years. Today I snapped, and finally tracked it down to a minimal test case. To see the problem, play with the following code: impor