[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-02-03 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : -- resolution: -> invalid stage: -> committed/rejected ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-30 Thread Vikash Agrawal
Vikash Agrawal added the comment: hi merwok, I didn't know this is the right place for that bug/query. I am still in the process of learning packaging, and at this moment I wont be able to tell that if its a problem of distutils2 or not, though I do feel that pysetup should have installed di

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-30 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: Thanks for your support of distutils2, but this tracker is the wrong place for this bug tracker, as no RPM spec file will be added to the distutils2 repo. If there are bugs in distutils2 that prevent you from making a RPM, please say so, otherwise I will close

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-24 Thread Dave Malcolm
Dave Malcolm added the comment: Hi Vikash - thanks for working on this. It's normal when packaging code "downstream" for Fedora to file a package review request at bugzilla.redhat.com, following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process (sorry if the process seem

[issue13851] Packaging distutils2 for Fedora

2012-01-24 Thread Vikash Agrawal
New submission from Vikash Agrawal : Packaging distutils2 for Fedora The spec file, is attached and lack many things. I also need to add files like README, COPYING etc. The problem is, after installtion of the generated rpm, "python -distutils2-1.0-0.1.0.a3.fc16.noarch.rpm" , distutils2 func