[issue13578] Add subprocess.iter_output() convenience function

2012-06-12 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan : -- versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue13578] Add subprocess.iter_output() convenience function

2012-02-06 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: > This biggest challenge I have noticed so far in exploring > this is how to handle timeouts on Windows I haven't actually looked into it but this somewhat recalls: http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964 Since issue1191964 is supposed to provide async subproce

[issue13578] Add subprocess.iter_output() convenience function

2011-12-10 Thread Nick Coghlan
Nick Coghlan added the comment: You can see a version of this here: https://bitbucket.org/ncoghlan/shell_command/src/2b1988b072aa/shell_command.py#cl-157 -- ___ Python tracker

[issue13578] Add subprocess.iter_output() convenience function

2011-12-10 Thread Ross Lagerwall
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail

[issue13578] Add subprocess.iter_output() convenience function

2011-12-10 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan : subprocess.check_output() is nice, but doesn't help if you want to process the piped data line-by-line. Currently, that means you have to do the full Popen dance if you want access to each line of output as it becomes available. This RFE is for a subprocess.