[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

Ezio Melotti added the comment: This should be fixed now, thanks for the report. FTR with Sphinx 1.0 all the links to :class:`time` and also :class:`datetime` needed to be fixed because they were pointing to the modules, with 0.6 only the :class:`time` in the body of attribute/method directive

[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 854e31d80151 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7': #13076: fix links to datetime.time. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/854e31d80151 New changeset 95689ed69097 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': #13076: fix links to datetime.time and datetime.datetime. ht

[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

Georg Brandl added the comment: No, it's not, it's how Sphinx works. Use :class:`.time` to refer to the datetime class. -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

Ezio Melotti added the comment: The broken links seem to be only in the "time objects" section, and only in the body of attribute/method directives. The attached patch fixes the issue by using :class:`~datetime.time` explicitly where the links are broken. Georg, is this a bug in Sphinx? ---

[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

Changes by R. David Murray : -- stage: -> needs patch versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pytho

[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

Changes by Geoffrey Bache : -- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Pyth

[issue13076] Bad links to 'time' in datetime documentation

New submission from Geoffrey Bache : Reading through the datetime module documentation, various places that refer to "datetime.time" objects are in fact links to the "time" module. They should refer to the appropriate section on the same page. -- messages: 144689 nosy: gjb1002 priority