[issue1167] gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so

Hirokazu Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Fixed in r67614. (issue4483) -- nosy: +ocean-city resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue1167] gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so

Ian Kelly added the comment: I'm not sure why you think this patch would be backwards incompatible. I've tested it with gdbm-1.8.0 and gdbm-1.7.3, and it works for those. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1167] gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so

Eh Tan added the comment: According to gdbm NEW, the dbm/ndbm compatibility routines was moved to libgdbm_compat in v1.8.1, which was released in late 2002. The patch works for gdbm-1.8.1+. But I am afraid that the patch will cause build error with gdbm-1.8.0 and earlier version. A more sophisti

[issue1167] gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so

Changes by Sean Reifschneider: -- priority: -> normal __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http:/

[issue1167] gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so

Changes by Martin v. Löwis: -- keywords: +patch __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.p

[issue1167] gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so

New submission from Ian Kelly: The ndbm functions in gdbm 1.8.1+ require the gdbm_compat library in addition to gdbm. -- components: Build, Extension Modules files: gdbm_ndbm.diff messages: 55939 nosy: ikelly severity: normal status: open title: gdbm/ndbm 1.8.1+ needs libgdbm_compat.so t