[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-09-26 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 112060f8abe8 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.5': Issue #10673: Document that Process.exitcode can be used to determine timeout https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/112060f8abe8 New changeset 0414ce8a3b5c by Berker Peksag in branch '3.6': Issue #10673: Me

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-09-26 Thread Berker Peksag
Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks, Tom. -- components: -Library (Lib) resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.7 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-09-13 Thread ppperry
Changes by ppperry : -- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-09-11 Thread Berker Peksag
Berker Peksag added the comment: Tom's patch looks good to me. Davin, can you have a look at it? -- stage: needs patch -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-09-11 Thread Tom Clark
Tom Clark added the comment: This patch is intended to document the behaviour of join(). (Originally submitted to #28094) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file44586/multiprocessing.patch ___ Python tracker __

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-09-11 Thread Tom Clark
Tom Clark added the comment: I've submitted a documentation patch with #28094. -- nosy: +tclark ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-07-31 Thread Ned Deily
Changes by Ned Deily : -- nosy: +davin ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2016-07-30 Thread Berker Peksag
Berker Peksag added the comment: Thread.join() also returns None in all cases so +1 for documenting the current behavior. -- keywords: +easy nosy: +berker.peksag stage: -> needs patch versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.6 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2011-01-03 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2010-12-10 Thread Ask Solem
Ask Solem added the comment: While it makes sense for `join` to raise an error on timeout, that could possibly break existing code, so I don't think that is an option. Adding a note in the documentation would be great. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2010-12-10 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: My guess is "it shouldn't", and "yes", but I've added the multiprocessing maintainers as nosy and they can answer definitively. -- nosy: +asksol, jnoller, r.david.murray ___ Python tracker

[issue10673] multiprocess.Process join method - timeout indistinguishable from success

2010-12-10 Thread Brian Cain
New submission from Brian Cain : When calling Process' join([timeout]) method, the timeout expiration case is indistinguishable from the successful join. I suppose the 'exitcode' attribute can deliver the necessary information, but perhaps join could stand on its own. If join() shouldn't be c