[issue10375] 2to3 print(single argument)

2013-11-04 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I'll close this then, as it will never happen. -- resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue10375] 2to3 print(single argument)

2013-11-04 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Probably, but I'm not going to do it. 2013/11/4 Terry J. Reedy : > > Terry J. Reedy added the comment: > > Benjamin, is the idea even feasible, or should this be closed? > > -- > versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2 > > __

[issue10375] 2to3 print(single argument)

2013-11-04 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Benjamin, is the idea even feasible, or should this be closed? -- versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker _

[issue10375] 2to3 print(single argument)

2010-11-12 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: >[Copied from Issue10070.] which is to say (for the benefit of other reviewers): This was a minor sub-issue mentioned there in passing and independent of the main issue and ignored in the extensive discussion thereof. -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___

[issue10375] 2to3 print(single argument)

2010-11-11 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe

[issue10375] 2to3 print(single argument)

2010-11-09 Thread Hallvard B Furuseth
New submission from Hallvard B Furuseth : Could 2to3 without -p notice more cases of print(single argument), to avoid slapping another () around them? For example: print(2*3) print(", ".join(dir)) print(very + long + single + argument) My internal bug detector zooms in on ((foo))