[issue1035576] Add New RPM-friendly record option to setup.py

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: On 6/26/2010 5:36 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > > Tarek Ziadé added the comment: > > distutils is now frozen in all branches, so not accepting new > features but just bug fixes. > > although distutils2 will not provide bdist_rpm, and I'd suggest the > command to liv

[issue1035576] Add New RPM-friendly record option to setup.py

Tarek Ziadé added the comment: distutils is now frozen in all branches, so not accepting new features but just bug fixes. although distutils2 will not provide bdist_rpm, and I'd suggest the command to live on its own, in a new project (like bdist_deb did in stdeb). The benefit is to have a d

[issue1035576] Add New RPM-friendly record option to setup.py

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: This appears to be a feature request. That would normally now mean applicable to 3.2 only. Or are the rule different for disutils? Should #755286 and #1035576 both remain open? Tarek, does distutils2 work supercede these? -- nosy: +tjreedy versions:

[issue1035576] Add New RPM-friendly record option to setup.py

Akira Kitada added the comment: duplicate of issue755286 -- nosy: +akitada ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1035576] Add New RPM-friendly record option to setup.py

Changes by Akira Kitada : -- nosy: +tarek ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.