[issue31501] Operator precedence description for arithmetic operators

2017-09-17 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +3623 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue31501> ___ ___ Python-

[issue31501] Operator precedence description for arithmetic operators

2017-09-17 Thread svelankar
New submission from svelankar: Description for the operator precedence should read "Multiplication, matrix multiplication division, remainder" instead of "Multiplication, matrix multiplication, division, floor division, remainder. Section 6.16. Operator precedence I feel th

[issue31023] Git Bootcamp and Cheat Sheet - Section 32.10 - Creating a Pull request needs an additional step

2017-07-24 Thread svelankar
New submission from svelankar: Section 32.10 - Creating a Pull Request Step 2 should be changed to Step 3 and so on. And a new step i.e. step 2 as "Press new pull request button" -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 299039 nosy: docs@python, svelanka

[issue30732] json.dumps() lacks information about RecursionError related to default function

2017-07-24 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +2908 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30732> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue30732] json.dumps() lacks information about RecursionError related to default function

2017-07-24 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +2907 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30732> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29447] Add os.PathLike support to the tempfile module

2017-05-02 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- nosy: +svelankar ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29447> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29447] Add os.PathLike support to the tempfile module

2017-05-02 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +1519 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29447> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29692] contextlib.contextmanager may incorrectly unchain RuntimeError

2017-04-09 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- nosy: +svelankar ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29692> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29692] contextlib.contextmanager may incorrectly unchain RuntimeError

2017-04-01 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +1131 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29692> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29692] contextlib.contextmanager may incorrectly unchain RuntimeError

2017-03-29 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +794 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29692> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29674] Use GCC __attribute__((alloc_size(x, y))) on PyMem_Malloc() functions

2017-03-14 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +552 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29674> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29674] Use GCC __attribute__((alloc_size(x, y))) on PyMem_Malloc() functions

2017-03-14 Thread svelankar
svelankar added the comment: Ok. As a side note, while compiling python source using gcc 7 [gcc (GCC) 7.0.1 20170314 (experimental)], few places in the code with case fallthrough (must be intentional) triggered this warning - -Wimplicit-fallthrough=. We can either disable this warning

[issue29674] Use GCC __attribute__((alloc_size(x, y))) on PyMem_Malloc() functions

2017-03-09 Thread svelankar
svelankar added the comment: So once these functions are decorated with this attribute, what kind of testing/validation you have in mind, please let me know. -- nosy: +svelankar ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29

[issue29682] Possible missing NULL check in pyexpat

2017-03-08 Thread svelankar
Changes by svelankar : -- pull_requests: +469 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29682> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue29749] Outdated int() docstring

2017-03-08 Thread svelankar
svelankar added the comment: True, but the docstring says "return 0 if no arguments are given". So please let me know, if you want me to still change it i.e. add int() or keep it as it is. Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bu

[issue29749] Outdated int() docstring

2017-03-08 Thread svelankar
svelankar added the comment: int docstring is the only one that needs to be changed. docstrings for float,tuple and list look fine to me. -- nosy: +svelankar ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue29