jack1142 added the comment:
I'm aware, I'm reporting this because as long as the instantiation of a Task is
documented, the documentation should still contain accurate up-to-date
information.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bu
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45380>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46555>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
jack1142 added the comment:
Looks like this has been reported again in https://bugs.python.org/issue39470
and a fix for it has already been merged.
--
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracke
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42174>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from jack1142 :
The documentation here:
https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/asyncio-task.html#asyncio.Task
Says that `loop` parameter was removed but it's still part of the signature. It
gets even more confusing when the deprecation right below it is saying that
*not* pa
Change by jack1142 :
--
components: +asyncio
nosy: +asvetlov, yselivanov
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue45099>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
jack1142 added the comment:
Does this change deserve an entry in the What's New in Python document in
addition to the changelog entry?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43535>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43532>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31861>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43006>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
jack1142 added the comment:
I was thinking that this could be the case but if I'm not mistaken, there's
actually quite a lot of types in this list that aren't collections (awaitable,
coroutine, iterable, iterator, generator, the async versions of those,
callable, *hmm, are vi
New submission from jack1142 :
It looks like the documentation lists standard library collections that support
parameterized generics[1] however, it seems to only feature a part of all the
collections that support parametrizing (I'm going by the list that was produced
by Ethan Smith[2
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39102>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29988>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from jack1142 :
`emoji-data.txt` and `emoji-variation-sequences.txt` files were formally pulled
into the UCD as of Version 13.0 [1] so I think that unicodedata as a package
providing access to UCD could support those as well.
In particular:
- `emoji-data.txt` lists character
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41566>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37373>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0
pull_requests: +19319
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20008
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Change by jack1142 :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +19186
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19875
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36310>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37006>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by jack1142 :
--
type: -> enhancement
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40273>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
New submission from jack1142 :
Starting in version 3.8, dicts are reversible so it would make sense if mapping
proxy were also reversible. Especially that `reversed(proxied_dict.keys())`
does work.
--
messages: 366315
nosy: jack1142
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39232>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from jack1142 :
Example code:
```
code = """
import typing
T = typing.TypeVar("T")
"""
exec(code, {})
```
Traceback:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "", line 3, in
File "C:
Change by jack1142 :
--
nosy: +jack1142
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12782>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
jack1142 added the comment:
I also noticed that putting `await` before the async comprehension will make
the code inside the comprehension run (though after it runs, it will fail on
awaiting list):
>>> await [await asyncio.sleep(1, print(x)) for x in range(5)]
0
1
2
3
4
Traceb
New submission from jack1142 :
asyncio REPL doesn't allow using asynchronous comprehensions outside of async
func. Same behavior can also be observed when using
`ast.PyCF_ALLOW_TOP_LEVEL_AWAIT` flag in `compile()`
Example with `async for`:
>>> async def async_gen():
... fo
New submission from jack1142 :
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.7/Doc/library/pathlib.rst#correspondence-to-tools-in-the-modos-module
The table mapping `os` functions to `Path`'s equivalents is missing
`os.makedirs` in the row with `Path.mkdir()` and they are both equivalent
jack1142 added the comment:
Sorry, it looks like I was looking at 3.7 branch and this is already
implemented in master branch.
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from jack1142 :
Currently shutil.copytree will allow to copy tree only if destination directory
doesn't exist. I think there could be added `exist_ok` keyword argument
(defaulting to `False`), which when set to `True` would prevent function from
raising `FileExistsError`.
33 matches
Mail list logo