Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Patch to modify setup.py comments on successful build
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30758/issue17845.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
I am not sure which component patchcheck corresponds to, so I have left that
out and added people on nosy list in http://bugs.python.org/issue17953. If I
have missed the concerned maintainer, kindly let me know.
--
nosy: +brett.cannon, pitrou
New submission from Yogesh Chaudhari:
Based on the threads about
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2013-May/002529.html and
discussion on http://bugs.python.org/issue17953; It would be good to add some
(very high level)checks inside patchcheck that will tell the user if Misc
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
That sounds good. I will open up an issue (if not for anything else other than
to get more eyes on this issue)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
You are most welcome Brett. I am just starting to contribute with this doc fix.
Didn't think a small detail in it will generate such a long debate in the
python-committers mailing list.
Is there a plan in action for 'fixing' Misc/NEWS. I n
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Documentation added for sys.modules
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30305/issue17953.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Typo fix
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30284/issue17914-7.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Minor modifications based on review comments.
1. Change mib array size to 2,
2. return value set to 0 consistently (in C code), and
3. removed IRIX #defines
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30282/issue17914-6.patch
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Based on the last 3 messages by Ned, Charles and Antoine, I keep thinking that
arguments made by Charles are very valid ones and that it would be better to
return 1. I say this (partly from the 'type' argument, but), mainly, *if* its
know
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Antoine and @Georg:
You are right. There is nothing much to be done. The only difference is those
of auto-generated files like Makefile and other config files created after
running ./config script.
This just needs a simple add/commit from the openssl
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Modified patch based on further comments and review.
1. Removed *everything* from os.py
2. removed typecasting for ncpu where not required.
3. removed redundant comments
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30246/issue17914-5.patch
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
+1 to Terry for "If its class does not override .__format__, then it seems that
it should act the same as a direct object instance"
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
I would like to take a crack at it. Would it be possible(I mean permission
wise)? How can I proceed?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Stinner:
1. While I agree with your idea of what you have done in test_os,
(particularly, for determining if platform is supported or not) there seems to
be no reason(AFAIK) to have a shutil for cpu_count. I agree with neologox there.
2. Also I am not
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
I am not sure how http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.1e.tar.gz can be
provided to python svn. Doesn't that require svn credentials to
check-out/add/check-in?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.py
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari :
--
hgrepos: -188
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12634>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
>It's this case that is currently an error, but it need not be:
>>>> format(object(), '1')
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
>TypeError: non-empty format string passed to object.__form
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@terry and @paul:
I have 2 argparse related patches, sitting idle for quiet sometime now. Can you
suggest any more names who can take this forward? (I could not find anyone else
related to argparse in http://docs.python.org/devguide/experts.html
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari :
--
hgrepos: -190
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17940>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30239/issue13461-3x.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13461>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari :
--
hgrepos: -191
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13461>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
This patch should work for 2.7 branch
--
hgrepos: +191
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30238/issue13461-27.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Modified patch based on review by neologix
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30236/issue17914-4.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@STINNER:
I don't understand. Where exactly should the patch handle this?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Please replace
integer.__format__(s)
with
integer.__format__('')
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Eric:
when you say: "If the type of the object really is "object", then it can use
string formatting. It's only for non-objects that I want to add the error.".
I am confused. Let me demonstrate what I'm thinking according to
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
The following patch will make use of 1.0.1e version of OpenSSL
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30232/issue17962.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
I guess that was simple enough. I am new to this issue tracker for Cpython. How
will the patch review/commit proceed?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Terry: Thanks for the info. I seem to have the elusive "*" after my username
now. I am not sure how this works, but can you review/test/apply the patch now?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bu
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Ned:
if cpus is None, then this will raise an exception in Python 3: `cpus >= 1 or
cpus == None`
I understand that cpus >= INTEGER will raise an exception and have already
modified the condition to remove that kind of check.
I was merely statin
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Modified patch to return None from C code
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30226/issue17914-3.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Returning None from C code sounds reasonable to me. Anyone else wants to pitch
in with suggestions for/against this?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Serhiy
Sorry, I missed your comments in the thread. I have made 2 changes and ignored
the cpu_count() returning 0, because it returns -1 on failure, else give the
number of CPUs. Also the test_os, checks for 0 return if that was to e the case
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Appreciate everyone's feedback. I have modified the patch based on further
messages in the thread.
@Neologix
modified posixmodule according to one in Trent's branch and used that for
cpu_count(). Kindly suggest improvements/changes if any.
@Ned:
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Based on the conversation and the particular inputs to the thread form neologix
and ezio, I would like to submit this patch.
It probably needs modification(s) as I am not sure what to do with the
implementation that is already present in multiprocessing
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
I have added a patch for default branch as well, because IMO the same issue
exists in all branches
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Remove extra code in argparse.py for 2.7 branch
--
hgrepos: +190
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30215/issue17940-27.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Removed the duplicated code from argparse.py
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30214/issue17940.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Based on Teery's comments, this patch makes the changes to the random remarks
section of the class documentation
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30134/issue12634.
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Similar changes for 2.7 branch
--
hgrepos: +188
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30135/issue12634-27.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
I am not sure if I am missing something. I had filled out the form at
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ on the day I submitted the
patch and even got back an email from Ewa Jodlowska. However, I don't see any
"*" after my name.
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
A user generated line with multiple spaces may be essential if we are getting
the usage data (particularly from) a csv file (that may have random spaces in
certain fields) or some other form of stored or auto-generated data
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file30108/7691d1d4b955.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17890>
___
___
Python-bug
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Made similar required changes for version 2.7
--
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30110/Issue17890-27.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari :
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30108/7691d1d4b955.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
The changes in Docs/library/unittest.rst have been made to reflect proper
arguments from Lib/unittest/runner.py
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30106/mywork.patch
46 matches
Mail list logo
