Weeble added the comment:
I had a closer look at the cif object in gdb. The ffi_type of the argument in
question has size 16, alignment 1, type FFI_TYPE_STRUCT and elements contains a
single nested ffi_type, of size 8, alignment 8, type FFI_TYPE_POINTER.
I think this pointer type is wrong
New submission from Weeble:
I'm not 100% certain this is a bug yet, but I'm beginning to think it's likely.
On 64-bit Linux, I can't pass a struct like this:
struct S { uint8_t data[16]; };
...to a function declared like this:
void f(struct S);
>From exper
Weeble added the comment:
Ah, sorry for the confusion.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21194>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
New submission from Weeble:
The JSON spec (http://www.json.org/) does not allow unescaped control
characters. (See the railroad diagram for strings and the grammar on the
right.) If json.dumps is called with ensure_ascii=False, it fails to escape
control codes in the range U+007F to U+009F
Weeble added the comment:
I'm not sure what rules are used by Windows to process the PATH string, but I
think they are similar to the rules used to parse the command-line into argv in
a C/C++ program: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17w5ykft.aspx
I have tested various arrangemen
Weeble added the comment:
I think the documentation for get_option_group is not right. I've created a new
bug: http://bugs.python.org/issue11699
--
nosy: +weeble
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Weeble :
The docs for optparse say this:
OptionParser.get_option_group(opt_str)
Return, if defined, the OptionGroup that has the title or the long
description equals to opt_str
After failing to get this to work at all, I looked at the implementation, and
the
Weeble added the comment:
Is there any way to write code that's safe with or without this fix? If I have
code that currently does this:
subprocess.check_call('""c:\some path with spaces" arg1 arg2 "a quoted arg""',
shell=True)
...will it break
New submission from Weeble :
Steps to reproduce:
1. Start IDLE.
2. Enter some text:
spam
eggs
3. Select the first line ("spam") and press control+c to copy.
4. Select the second line ("eggs") and press control+v to paste.
Expected result:
spam
spam
(With the caret at t
Weeble added the comment:
I can't see any useful reason to go to the absolute start of the line in
the interactive shell. However, it does make sense in the source editor,
and it is consistent with, for example, Visual Studio. The first use-
case off the top of my head is when you wa
Weeble added the comment:
You're right: we should find a solution that's safe and supported.
I *think* the primary reason for overriding the home key behaviour was
not for the interactive shell, but to make it easier to edit code. Most
programmer's editors that do automatic i
Weeble added the comment:
I posted a question on comp.lang.tcl here:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/browse_thread/thread/aab17806f6fa837f#
By the way, which versions of Tk must Python support? Where do I find
out things like that?
___
Python
Weeble added the comment:
Well, the status quo depends on an unsupported field - "anchor". As far
as I can tell, the only other option that allows any customisation of
cursor behaviour is to re-implement the entire selection system from the
ground up. Would it be acceptable to det
Weeble added the comment:
A thought occurs to me: would this patch make it harder to cope with
awkward firewalls that block the connection? Are they more or less
likely to intervene when passing a port of 0 and letting it pick a port
automatically? And if they do intervene, would users be
Weeble added the comment:
Just got a chance to test this on a Windows desktop with a proper
keyboard. (My laptop does weird things with num-lock and scroll-lock.) I
got it to crash once, but I have no idea what was special about that
time. Otherwise I can reproduce the exception traceback
Changes by Weeble :
--
nosy: +weeble
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3068>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyth
Weeble added the comment:
Another complication. On Windows, this line doesn't do what it claims:
if (event.state & 12) != 0 and event.keysym == "Home":
# state&1==shift, state&4==control, state&8==alt
return # ; fall back to class binding
The comment
Weeble added the comment:
I have experienced similar problems in Python 2.6.1 on Windows, and
found them to be due to Tk 8.5. I posted my findings here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/idle-dev/2009-January/002738.html
In summary, Tk 8.5 changed the name of the "anchor" mark to be
Weeble added the comment:
I installed Ubuntu on a laptop at the beginning of January and have
applied the patch I submitted above to IDLE. I've been using it
regularly for the last few weeks and have had no problems with it.
___
Python tracker
Weeble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Okay, I've uploaded a patch. As suggested, it passes 0 for the port
number and the port is automatically assigned. It then extracts the port
from the socket and passes it to the subprocess. Note that this means
the subprocess i
Changes by Weeble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12180/IDLE_automatic_ports.diff
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.o
Weeble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Is this ever likely to make it into IDLE? Running without a subprocess
in Windows appears to interact badly with the multiprocessing library
(attempting to spawn a process just creates a new IDLE window). I
couldn't figure out how t
Changes by Weeble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +weeble
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1529142>
___
___
Python-bugs
23 matches
Mail list logo
