Sandro Tosi added the comment:
The documentation reports this example:
>>> urlparse('www.cwi.nl:80/%7Eguido/Python.html')
ParseResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='www.cwi.nl:80/%7Eguido/Python.html',
params='', query=
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Adding Senthil as per expert list
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16932>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
Hello,
as reported at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2013-January/012375.html
urlparse fails to parse URLs without a schema and with a url path, as opposed
to what's documented at
http://docs.python.org/2/library/urlparse.html?highlight=url
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
> Out of curiosity, does anyone know if the following works on all or most
> systems?
>
> $ open _build/html/index.html
it doesn't work on my Debian system:
$ open _build/html/index.html
Couldn't get a file descriptor referring to the cons
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
i'd use
make -C Doc html
much more compact and what you would usually find on the internet for "cd into
the dir and run the html target in it"
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
wrote:
>> no-one has done the work of testing, preparation and migration: do you
>> volunteer? :)
>
> What needs doing exactly? I would volunteer if guided. I normally
(you always can
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
wrote:
> It is my preference to be able to build all of CPython with the
> already-installed distro packages, instead of pulling in foreign ones.
IMO, I think with a project as bit as CPython, you should
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hello Tshepang,
the documentation is not compatible with Sphinx versions different than the one
the Makefile will download (in this case it's 1.0.7 for all active branches).
I'd suggest to build the doc with just
$ make -C Doc html
and it will fetch
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I think the aim of that part of the devguide is to give one clear, simple,
working way to operate on different branches at the same time. Additional
workflows can be presented, but probably in another place (like the FAQ
indeed). What others thing about this
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Éric: I've just committed your patch, with also the latest changes.
Philip: In order to be consistent with the way the documentation is compiled on
the Python platform, the svn checkout must be used: else if you refer to the
upstream website, a contributo
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Ezio, thanks for the review: how about this new version of the patch? I've
left the more "verbose" version in the 3.2 example, while used the more compact
way for the 2.7 .
Re first committing to 2.7 then 3.2 and then merge, that would work f
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I tend to agree with Terry that this report can be closed: base 16 is quite
known and it's high likely that if you know what hexadecimal is, you also aware
of the concept of "base X" and viceversa.
If no-one objects, I&
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
As reported at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-August/009837.html
gzip/zlib allows for a compression level=0 (that's basically no compression) so
the documentation should mention that possibility too.
--
assignee: docs@python
compo
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
It's fixed in default too: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f46b4b7b817c
It was not shown because the commit message misses the issue reference.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
Hello,
it has been reported at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-April/008215.html but given it
raises some question whether it's a bug in the doc or in the code, i'd rather
report the issue here and hear what other think:
>>>
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
Hello,
this has been reported at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-July/009223.html but since I have no
experience to judge if it's correct or not, i'll just report it:
>>>
I've recenty started to try using C code in python us
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hello,
I'm writing some tests from an MTA, and so I'm using smtplib. Sadly the login()
method doesn't allow to choose the auth method to use (but it's selected from a
static list compared with what's advertized from the MTA) while
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
In the smtplib doc I read:
Low-level methods corresponding to the standard SMTP/ESMTP commands HELP,
RSET, NOOP, MAIL, RCPT, and DATA are also supported. Normally these do not need
to be called directly, so they are not documented here. For details, consult
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Christopher!
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
and the patch...
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25800/ipaddress_module_doc.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Attached is a draft of the module documentation. I didn't commit yet cause we
might want to rework it deeply. Else we can just commit the patch and let the
comments coming as additional diffs.
--
stage: needs patch -> patc
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Lars for the patch! Éric, why did you add 2.7 version? AFAISee 2.7
doesn't have the "Inplace Operators" section.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Hynek: comments committed
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14814>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thank Nick for pointing to Terry's review! I'm attaching here a patch
addressing the points Terry highlighed. probably we should review this patch
before moving forward with the API doc?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I'm attaching a very preliminary draft of the howto, any comment is welcome. Of
course, it misses several references to the API doc; I'll see if I can beat
Georg and post a preliminary version of that too :)
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +sandro.
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12947>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Terry,
the same problem recently came up on docs@ and digging into it, it turned out
that sphinx is currently ignoring doctest directives[1], but that it was fixed
in sphinx 1.1[2].
[1]
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/issue/169/strip-doctest
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I think that something on the line "Hey, it looks like this phrase misses some
words, and I've just fixed it" would have been nicer - IMO.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyt
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Committed, thanks for the patch. For next times, please invest even a small
amount of time describing why you opened the issue and what the patch fixes:
it's definitely nicer not having to infer it from the diff.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resol
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I agree with Raymond that last paragraph should be removed; +1 for the
remaining part
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Oh sorry Éric, I completely oversaw there was an issue associated with the cset
- i'll pay more attention next time!
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Here's the proposed patch.
I'm sorry but probably 'hg diff' went too wild, and since I moved the "Using
several working copies" as the first sub-paragraph of "Forward-Porting" it
seems it got confused, so the diff is not
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
+1
It is important to note that if you have a 'cpython' as a clone (which pulls
and pushed to hg.python.org) and from it you clone '2.7' and '3.2' (as I think
it's the most common setup) you first have to pull from cpython an
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
It's seems like a deja-vu: I thought I saw this problem once, and was already
fixed - bah, it was tricky (traceback needs to be indented for the code to be
highlighted), that's why I remember it
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: ->
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Peter: thanks for the patch!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I've reworded a bit the patch: thanks for it, Andrew
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks for the patch, Tshepang!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: commit review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Aaron: thanks for the patch!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
poq, would you like to also prepare a patch for the documentation with what
Thomas suggested? I'd be happy to review when ready
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks for your contribution!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks for your contribution!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 09:06, Georg Brandl wrote:
> I agree: if we know that a ThreadError will always be raised in this
> instance, we should document it as such.
I've already prepared a small patch for that (every supported release
has a differen
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I've just uploaded regex into Debian: this will hopefully gives some more eyes
looking at the module and reporting some feedbacks.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks for your patch: committed!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
eheh yeah it seems so :)
What I think Tshepang wants is this:
- the devguide contains the description of how to document python
- that documentation is about a set of ReST coding commands that
generate the desired output
- currently the devguide reports only the
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
see msg155067
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
additionally, devguide has no version associated with it.
--
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
3.1 and 2.6 as in security fix only: please don't add those versions for
non-sec issue
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
The devguide reports a long section about code convering cpython:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html . It uses Ned's coverege.py and
has a lot of details about how to use it and how to generate nice reports out
of it. do we need an internal too
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:52, Éric Araujo wrote:
> I’m not entirely sure they are needed (Python code blocks seem to be
> autodetected and show up colorized too), but I did it for consistency (and to
> make my editor detect them).
Yeah, I refrain
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24558/list_sort-py32.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14050>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
I'm providing patches for what reported at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-February/007481.html . I'm not sure
on wording or even if we want them in the tutorial section, but I think it
would be nice to have it documented n
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks for all you inputs!
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
>> OK, so if I got it correctly, I should document
>> multiprocessing.queue.SimpleQueue in 2.7 and 3.1 [...]
>
> s/3.1/3.2/
yeah, just a typo :)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
It's the way all the subclasses are imported into the main module that got me
in fault, I think. OK, so if I got it correctly, I should document
multiprocessing.queue.SimpleQueue in 2.7 and 3.1 and
multiprocessing.SimpleQueue in 3.3 also adding the hu
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
At the subject says, several references to Queue are linking to Queue module
and not to multiprocessing.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 153218
nosy: docs@python, sandro.tosi
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Eli for the heads-up, I had missed Antoine's comment!
Antoine, I'm probably missing something, but SimpleQueue is present in 2.7 and
3.2 too, so why not mention it in the doc for those ve
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
components: -None
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13939>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hello,
i'm sorry but this is not the right place for this report. Please refer to
ubuntu or gnome user support forum for help.
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> invalid
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: ope
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:42, Boštjan Mejak wrote:
> Seriously, how old are you two clowns?
I think it's enough: FTR I'm +1 on removing Retro tracker account,
effective immediately (if any ad
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 15:08, Boštjan Mejak wrote:
> Can you fix all occurences of "floating point" (when in a role of
> an adjective) to "floating-point" throughout Python docs?
What I was asking is if *you* (since you care about
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Wow.. do you really expect any positive outcome from you reply style?
I'll pretend I didn't read your reply and let me rephrase my question like
this: there are several occurrences of 'floating point' in python doc, are you
going to fix a
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
There are a lot more occurrences of 'floating point' in our doc: are you going
to fix them too?
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks July, I've just committed your patches!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: -> fixed
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.or
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Denver, do you have the time to address the review on rietveld and propose a
new patch?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24277/issue13478-py32.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13478>
___
___
Python-bug
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I propose these 2 patches: I'm not exactly proud of
- 'in a platform specific manner' in the first hunk
- the second hunk
I know that there should be a better way to express it, but since I can't get
to it I'd just ask for suggestion
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Maybe we can add a very small example before the whole note to show just how to
use Popen in simple situation, and so the shlex part below will add more
details for more advanced cases.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Terry for the ping, I've just committed it - thanks again to everyone
for the help/suggestions.
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: commit review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
The outdated command is addressed in issue#12415, and I think it's better to
provide a precise command in devguide, so that if you don't use make you don't
even need to understand where to grab the information to checkout third-party
tools.
Ad
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
that looks ok to me.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12415>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13801>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Éric, thanks for spotting it: removed.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12409>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
"Documenting Python" has been:
- moved to devguide; http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/5d4a90e568ed
- removed from 2.7, 3.2 and default;
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8975f7d0fbf7
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/70c46599fb0e
http://hg.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 04:36, Éric Araujo wrote:
>
> Éric Araujo added the comment:
>
> I just replied to your python-dev email. I think you can update 2.7 to use
> Sphinx 1.0 as soon as you’re down to a handful of warnings.
thanks! I've
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Ah indeed, I could have looked at sys.path doc myself after all.. sorry for the
noise.
--
resolution: -> invalid
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python track
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Éric,
thanks for the review.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 18:13, Éric Araujo wrote:
>
> Éric Araujo added the comment:
>
> About the devguide patch:
>
> a) The part about C roles and directives should probably mention version
> specif
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24219/doc2devguide-cpython.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12409>
___
___
Python-bug
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Sure, sorry I didn't make it before; here attached the 2 patches, one against
devguide, the other to default cpython repo.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24218/doc2devguide-devguide.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
But we may explain what's behind: "after the mercury chemical element symbol" -
what do you think?
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Oleg,
thanks for your interest in aifc module!
I think that if the fix for audioop has a reason for itself to exists, then
another issue (for that only) has to be filed and set the accordingly
dependency on this one.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi,
i'm at last back with some work to show; I've integrated all the "Documenting
python" doc into devguide, and the commits are in this sandbox:
http://hg.python.org/sandbox/morph-devguide/shortlog/a92d431ef749
(`documenting` branch).
I
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
resolution: -> invalid
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13762>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscri
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hello Tshepang,
The current section is at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/docquality.html#helping-with-the-developer-s-guide
reachable from the mainpage looking for helping with documentation.
it may be a little to condense but it is a good start (and it seems
Changes by Sandro Tosi :
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11205>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hello, following up
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-January/007026.html I noticed the
whole Document class (and relative methods) is not documented.
Maybe it is a choice to not document it, or maybe it's just a missing doc,
dunno, the'
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Arnaud,
would you like to provide a patch to update the MAKE_FUNCTION opcode
description? That would speed up a bit the fix-up.
Also, I don't have that clear what "For each keyword only default, ..." mean:
are those the default values for ke
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi all, how can we fix it? or better, should we fix it? From a user POV, it is
a weird to see 3.1 doc referring to 3.2 doc as "in development" then clicking
on that link, being redirect to 3.3a0 doc and see there that 3.2 is stable
(with no referen
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hello, following up
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-December/006782.html , I'm opening
this issue to have others confirmation of what's happening:
echo -e "def ev(r):\nprint(r)\nreturn r\n\n{ev(1): ev(2), ev(3):
ev(4)}"
New submission from Sandro Tosi :
Hi,
looking at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-December/006672.html I
tried to replicate what the user said, and *it seems* that -c and -m doesn't
add the current directory to the start of sys.path:
$ echo -e "import sys\nprint
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Éric, did you reconsider the text of the patch or this issue just passed
under your radar?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Davi for the report and Jordan for the patch! Jordan, a tip for your
(hopefully) future contributions: for doc patches, please don't re-indent the
whole paragraph, since it makes harder to identify the actual changes, just
change what is needed, an
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Davi, thanks for your report! I've removed the reference from symbol to
parser, given this last module doesn't show anymore how to user symbol, and
it's encouraging to use ast module instead.
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution:
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Thanks Marc for the patch, I've just committed it.
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: commit review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
