Rudd-O added the comment:
I saw your talk. Excellent. Let's make sysadmins and release managers
happy while keeping the excellent buildout infrastructure for
developers. I KNOW we can do it, and I'm going to help you get there.
And maybe next year we both can do a talk about it
Rudd-O added the comment:
Excellent.
El Domingo 05 Abril 2009,
=?utf-8?q?tarek_ziad=c3=a9_=3creport=40bugs=2epython=2eorg=3...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za
escribió:
> Tarek Ziadé added the comment:
>
> Rudd-O, I am trying to see if we can build a team of people that could
> wo
Rudd-O added the comment:
about python trunk...
gimme some time to port them incrementally to all popular stable pythons
first, then to trunk. will be glad to do this.
Now, by trunk, do you mean python 3.x?
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Rudd-O added the comment:
about python trunk...
gimme some time to port them incrementally to all popular stable pythons
first, then to trunk. will be glad to do this.
Now, by trunk, do you mean python 3.x?
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Rudd-O added the comment:
patch does what others did, plus this time it lets the specfile
autodiscover the python abi so the name is correct regardless of against
whichever python interpreter the package is built.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file13381/python-2.4-distutils
Rudd-O added the comment:
Improved version of the autonaming patch, now makes rpmbuild accept
files that were installed with spaces on their names.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file13372/python-2.4-distutils-bdist_rpm-autonames+optimize-v2.patch
Rudd-O added the comment:
ahaha! I have the patch that implements this functionality.
1) it renames the RPM package name to python-%packagename-py2.4 and and
its requirements as well.
2) it autooptimizes (-O1) any RPM built if no optimization has been
configured in setup.cfg, so it works with
Rudd-O added the comment:
I am considering some changes in the auto-dependency part of the patch.
Keep tuned.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Rudd-O added the comment:
Apropos this bug, the issues are fleshed out here:
http://rudd-o.com/new-projects/python-improvements/how-to-slash-man-years-from-the-process-of-building-rpms-out-of-python-modules
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Rudd-O added the comment:
FYI: In RPM, the correct dependency to require a particulr python minor
version is:
python(abi) = 2.X
where X is the minor version.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Rudd-O added the comment:
last comment, first line, I should amend it to say that even in 64bit
arches, the /usr/lib (NOT ilb64) sitepackages dir is available.
I would have to actually try this on the packages that I have, see how i
fare
Rudd-O added the comment:
apparently, /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages IS in the sys.path, which
would seem to indicate that python would actually load pure python
modules from there.
Which means that the only fixes that need to go within distutils would be:
1. a fix so in 64bit arches, pure
Rudd-O added the comment:
More info:
>From my wicked noarch RPM compiled in an i386 machine, installed into my
64 bit centos (same OS):
[rud...@tobey ~]$ python
Python 2.4.5 (#1, Mar 13 2009, 12:13:36)
[GCC 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyri
Rudd-O added the comment:
brown paper bug in the last lexic patch
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file13316/python-2.4-distutils-bdist_rpm-rpmversion-lexicalorder.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
New submission from Rudd-O :
Hello, guys. I am looking for feedback on the topic which I am going to
lay out. First, sys.path:
---
# python2.4
>>> import sys
>>> sys.path
['', '/home/rudd-o', '/usr/lib64/python24.zip', '/us
Rudd-O added the comment:
This patch autodetects dependencies based on the earlier patch and egg
metadata, if setuptools is importable.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file13314/python-2.4-distutils-bdist_rpm-autodeps.patch
___
Python tracker
Rudd-O added the comment:
A better patch
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file13313/python-2.4-distutils-bdist_rpm-rpmversion-lexicalorder.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Rudd-O added the comment:
the newest svnversions patch is to handle the case of people who want to
build svn checkouts (usually versionnumbered by dev or dev-rXXXYYZZ).
it overrides the release to be zero so they never upgrade alpha, beta
packages.
--
Added file:
http
Changes by Rudd-O :
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file13301/python-2.4-distutils-bdist-rpm.patch
(prerequisite for the patch I wrote which is the prereleaseversion.patch)
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
Rudd-O added the comment:
Heads up: The fix requires a patch (distributed with the python 2.4.x
RPM in CentOS) to be applied first. I am attaching said patch so you
can apply the fix.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5
New submission from Rudd-O :
Description of problem:
Building pre-release python distutils packages with python setup.py
bdist_rpm
works, but the version number is "RPM-higher" than the official release
package
that is released later.
This constitutes a problem because many of the
21 matches
Mail list logo
