Rick Teachey added the comment:
Lending my voice to the suggestion of limiting the class attribute check to
`typing.ClassVar` and `ClassVar`. It can always be expanded later if it is
needed.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Rick Teachey added the comment:
> Is there any scenario where the following code would be useful...
Perhaps if someone, in search of a speedup, were sort of rolling their own
lighter-weight equivalent to the typing module (in order to avoid importing the
full typing module), but duck ty
Rick Teachey added the comment:
The init method that comes up for int, str, float, etc is just the object init:
assert int.__init__ is object.__init__
Probably the thing to do is grab any init methods that aren't the
object.__init__ while stripping out the dataclass-created init me
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Sorry, mean to say it works just fine *without* the import.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33453>
___
___
Rick Teachey added the comment:
To be clear: it works just fine with the annotations import.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33453>
___
___
New submission from Rick Teachey :
This is broken in 3.7 (both beta 3 and 4):
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import ClassVar, Any
@dataclass
class C():
class_var: ClassVar[Any] = object()
data: str
Traceback:
Traceback (most recent
New submission from Rick Teachey :
The dataclasses module is incredibly easy to use. This is a good thing. BUT one
downside is it will definitely be utilized by people who don't have a thorough
understanding of how it does what it does.
Even for me, despite having a very good understandi
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Closed as duplicate of issue 13044.
--
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Rick Teachey added the comment:
I am on Anaconda 4.5.1 on Windows 10 (Python 3.6.5). I have confirmed that I DO
get the error on another machine with the same version installed, so the lack
of an error seems specific to my current machine. I do not know what could be
causing this; it is very
Change by Rick Teachey :
--
components: +Library (Lib)
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33328>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Rick Teachey added the comment:
The interactive session result is below:
GeneratorExit
Exception ignored in:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\ricky\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python37\lib\types.py",
line 27, in _ag
File "C:\Users\ricky\AppData\Local\
New submission from Rick Teachey :
Hello:
The attached python file runs a pdb interactive session for a generator. It
produces an error in Python 3.7 Beta 3, but no error in 3.6.
I searched for this issue and there do seem to be things that are related to it
already, but I haven&#
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Thank you; I gave it a go. Hopefully didn't cause too much additional work for
someone.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Rick Teachey :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +6033
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33190>
___
___
Py
Rick Teachey added the comment:
I'll also say: one of the biggest reasons I was excited to read the
`dataclasses` PEP was because I thought "AWESOME! Now I can delete all of the
stupid boilerplate __init__ and __repr__ methods for those `typing.Sequences`,
`typing.Mapping
Rick Teachey added the comment:
> passing keyword arguments to metaclass will be much more rare for dataclasses
> than passing a ready namespace
The impetus of my running into these issues was assuming that things like
`Generic[MyTypeVar]` would "just work" with `make_d
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Eric: see also Ivan's comment on Issue 33190, which will factor into the
solution to this I think. It seems you can't just pass the `namespace` to the
`kwds` argument (as I have done in my solu
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Excellent; thank you very much for the explanation.
I have never done a PR on a project this size but I'll give it a try.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
New submission from Rick Teachey :
I am pretty sure this is a bug. If not I apologize.
Say I want to dynamically create a new `C` class, with base class `MyABC` (and
dynamically assigned abstract method `m`). This works fine if I use `type`, but
if I use `new_class`, the keyword argument to
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Same error on 3.7.
Probably getting beyond my knowledge here but from the error message, it seems
like the answer is simply that:
type('MyChild', (MyParent[int],), {})
...is just the wrong way to make a new `type` when utilizing type
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Sorry: to be clear, the error only occurs when attempting to create the class
using `make_dataclass`.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
New submission from Rick Teachey :
I'm getting the following error at when attempting to create a new `dataclass`
with any base class that is supplied a type variable:
TypeError: type() doesn't support MRO entry resolution; use
types.new_class()
In principle, it seems like this
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Looks great to me. Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33141>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Yeah and I think lines 2709-2712 of TestDescriptors also needs removed.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Eric, looking at the PR; note that if you do this for the __set_name__ check:
if inspect.ismethoddescriptor(self.default):
...an object like the one below will not get its __set_name__ called, even
though PEP 487 says it should:
class D:
def
Rick Teachey added the comment:
I suppose one downside of that solution is __set_name__ will be called for
every Field whether or not it is need. Probably can't be helped without major
complications.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.py
Rick Teachey added the comment:
Sounds like a relatively easy solution then. Hopefully it makes the beta 3 so I
can use it immediately- thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
Rick Teachey added the comment:
hmmm... if I check the C.d class attribute it seems to return the
descriptor instance object (not a field object) before any C instances have
been created. i guess this is just a part of how the dataclass
implementation works.
i didn't realize there'
New submission from Rick Teachey :
Summary: The descriptor `__set_name__` functionality (introduced in Python 3.6)
does not seem to be working correctly for `dataclass.Field` objects with a
default pointing to a descriptor. I have attached a file demonstrating the
trouble.
Details: If I set
29 matches
Mail list logo
