Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30044>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34451>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12915>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Jha added the comment:
> Note that these are two solution that take very different approaches. What
> Nick is suggesting with "checking for two or more hanging INDENTS" would
> drastically change how codeop._maybe_compile does its thing, while his other
Rahul Jha added the comment:
> That may actually be another alternative: instead of doing the "try
> appending newlines and see if it works or generates different errors",
> we may be able to switch to the tokenizer if the initial compilation
> fails and check for hang
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34360>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Rahul Jha :
After configuring and building using the command:
./configure --with-pydebug ** make -j
I ran the test suite (without changing anything) and saw that test_pkg has
failed. Here is the output of `./python.exe -m test -v test_pkgutil`:
== CPython 3.10.0a0
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Rahul Jha added the comment:
Some of the test cases from Nick's patch are not passing on master:
ast.literal_eval('') # raises SyntaxError; expected: ValueError
ast.literal_eval('6j--3') # expected: 3+6j
ast.literal_eval('(2j+4j)+(1+2)') #
Rahul Jha added the comment:
Nick, hello! I'd like to take it onwards from here.
--
nosy: +RJ722
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue17490>
___
___
Change by Rahul Jha :
--
pull_requests: +6347
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33217>
___
___
Python-bugs-lis
Rahul Jha added the comment:
Hi Ethan,
The only thing which is left is to change the Deprecation Warning to raise a
`TypeError` and alter the tests accordingly.
Seeing that most of the work for the issue has already been done, can I take it
forward from here on wards, please
12 matches
Mail list logo