Pavel Kazakov added the comment:
> (Alternatively, we could redefine squares in Python. All other languages
> just have the regular squares; Python has a super *extra* square 2! That
> clearly makes squares in Python *better* than squares in other languages...)
Heh. I initially wa
New submission from Pavel Kazakov:
This is probably being nitpicky, but in the introduction section, the squares
list include a 2:
squares = [1, 2, 4, 9, 16, 25]
However, 2 is not a square number (perfect square). So it should be:
[1, 4, 9, 16, 25]
I've included a patch that removes
