[issue46060] Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value

2021-12-13 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.or

[issue46060] Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value

2021-12-12 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +pbryan nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +28299 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30078 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/i

[issue46060] Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value

2021-12-12 Thread Paul Bryan
New submission from Paul Bryan : Currently, the documentation states it creates a new event loop; it should also indicate that it returns the newly created event loop. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 408425 nosy: docs@python, pbryan2 priority: normal

[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation

2021-02-27 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.or

[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation

2021-02-27 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +23453 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24668 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation

2021-02-27 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43345> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation

2021-02-27 Thread Paul Bryan
New submission from Paul Bryan : >From Typing-sig list: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:54 PM Paul Bryan wrote: > I don't think __required_keys__ or __optional_keys__ are documented, at least > not in https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/typing.html. Is there any reason > we can

[issue42269] Add ability to set __slots__ in dataclasses

2021-02-07 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +pbryan ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42269> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33129] Add kwarg-only option to dataclass

2021-01-25 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +pbryan ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33129> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue42904] get_type_hints does not provide localns for classes

2021-01-11 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42904> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue42904] get_type_hints does not provide localns for classes

2021-01-11 Thread Paul Bryan
New submission from Paul Bryan : According to PEP 563: > The get_type_hints() function automatically resolves the correct value of > globalns for functions and classes. It also automatically provides the > correct localns for classes. This statement about providing correct lo

[issue42662] Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering.

2020-12-16 Thread Paul Bryan
Paul Bryan added the comment: Retracting. -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.or

[issue42662] Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering.

2020-12-16 Thread Paul Bryan
Change by Paul Bryan : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +22668 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23808 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue42662] Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering.

2020-12-16 Thread Paul Bryan
New submission from Paul Bryan : Currently the data model documentation does not specify the order of keys in __annotations__ dictionary. It is currently in the order that arguments or attributes are declared. I propose to make this explicit. Rationale: Having order explicitly specified in

[issue42592] TypedDict: total=False but still key required

2020-12-07 Thread Paul Bryan
Paul Bryan added the comment: Your patch LGTM, Brandt. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42592> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue42592] TypedDict: total=False but still key required

2020-12-07 Thread Paul Bryan
New submission from Paul Bryan : I believe "a" below should be an optional key, not a required one. Python 3.9.0 (default, Oct 7 2020, 23:09:01) [GCC 10.2.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >

[issue15873] datetime: add ability to parse RFC 3339 dates and times

2015-03-05 Thread Paul Bryan
Changes by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +pbryan ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15873> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: