Changes by Ludwig Hähne :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26479/array_sizeof.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15424>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Ludwig Hähne :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26510/array_sizeof_v3.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15424>
___
___
Python-bug
Ludwig Hähne added the comment:
Meador, Serhiy, I've add patches for Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 following Serhiy
suggestions.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Changes by Ludwig Hähne :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26480/array_sizeof_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15424>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Ludwig Hähne :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26713/array_sizeof_v4.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15424>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Ludwig Hähne :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26757/array_sizeof_3.2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15424>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Ludwig Hähne :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26756/array_sizeof_2.7.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15424>
___
___
Python-bug
Ludwig Hähne added the comment:
Meador, thanks for reviewing. The updated patch is now attached to the bug.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26718/array_sizeof_v5.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Ludwig Hähne added the comment:
Serhiy, the tests now explicitly check the base size of the array.
I'm not sure if I got the base size compution right (only checked on 32bit
Linux). Could you check that the struct definition in the test makes sense and
matches the C arrayobject defin
Ludwig Hähne added the comment:
Revised the patch based on the discussion in issue #15402
(http://bugs.python.org/msg166372). It doesn't typecast the function anymore
and instead casts to the array type inside the function.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file
Ludwig Hähne added the comment:
Yes, it would be great if the change could be applied to 3.2 (and 2.7) but I
guess not many people will be affected by the problem.
BTW, I just submitted the contributor form.
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Ludwig Hähne added the comment:
Uses self->allocated instead of Py_SIZE as Martin suggested.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26480/array_sizeof_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Ludwig Hähne :
If sys.getsizeof is called on an array, the result doesn't include the size of
the items:
>>> from array import array
>>> a = array("i", [0] * 10)
>>> a.__sizeof__()
40
While this makes sense for a list, an a
Ludwig Hähne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Just realized that passing 'close_fds=True' also circumvents the problem:
s = subprocess.Popen(("cat"), stdin=subprocess.PIPE, close_fds=True)
Should this issue be closed as it's that easy to avoid? I would
Ludwig Hähne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Hi, I narrowed the problem down to the creation of the error pipe in
_execute_child:
>> errpipe_read, errpipe_write = os.pipe()
>> self._set_cloexec_flag(errpipe_write)
If I protect these two lines with a lock, I cannot
New submission from Ludwig Hähne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pythons subprocess module has a race condition when stdin is used. The
problem can be reproduced with the following script (based on the script
in issue "#1731717"/"msg32210" (slightly changed to use stdin):
16 matches
Mail list logo
