Changes by Leonardo De Marchi :
--
pull_requests: +2014
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Leonardo De Marchi :
--
pull_requests: +2012
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30464>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Leonardo De Marchi :
--
pull_requests: +2011
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Leonardo De Marchi:
As suggested by rhettinger in http://bugs.python.org/msg294438:
I agree that the comment should be changed. While we at it, perhaps sync-up
with expovariate() code and eliminate the ``u <= 1e-7`` test:
Instead of:
elif alpha ==
Changes by Leonardo De Marchi :
--
pull_requests: +1896
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30464>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Leonardo De Marchi:
The gammavariate function in random.py has a wrong comment.
It says that when alpha is one it's equivalent to call expovariate(1).
We can see that is not true (see graphs) and it should be expovariate(1/beta).
It's not a big deal but it
