Joseph Schaeffer added the comment:
Thanks for looking into it! I'm glad that issue will be fixed, as at least one
website was actually recommending using .jumpahead(i) for i in 1..100 for
independent seed.
I suspect in my use case I'll want to continue my previous methods; I
New submission from Joseph Schaeffer :
Reading the Python 2.6 docs, it appeared that using random.jumpahead would
allow the initialization of several generators with the same seed but having
much different internal states. While the resulting PRNG appear to have
different internal states, the
