[issue3013] disutils fails with GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523

John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Georg Brandl wrote: | Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: | | Do you need the (\.\d+)* trailer in the regex at all? | | -- | nosy: +georg.brandl Not sure

[issue3013] disutils fails with GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523

John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Quick patch that changes the regex -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10481/cygwinccompiler.diff ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://

[issue3012] disutils fails with GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523

John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: can you link the bug that this is a dupe of? I did a search and didn't find anything. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.

[issue3013] disutils fails with GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523

Changes by John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- components: +Distutils ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3013> ___ _

[issue3013] disutils fails with GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523

New submission from John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I just upgraded my cygwin installation to the latest versions. Which seems to include GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523 and GNU dllwrap (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523 It seems that their version notation

[issue3012] disutils fails with GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523

New submission from John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I just upgraded my cygwin installation to the latest versions. Which seems to include GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523 and GNU dllwrap (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20080523 It seems that their version notation

[issue2672] speed of set.update(

John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > John, when y=[], the update method has to create a new list iterator on > ea

[issue2672] speed of set.update(

John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > This has nothing to do with set.update, the difference is due to th

[issue2672] speed of set.update([])

Changes by John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- type: -> performance __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2672> __ ___ Python-b

[issue2672] speed of set.update([])

New submission from John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I was performance profiling some of my own code, and I ran into something unexpected. Specifically, set.update(empty_generator_expression) was significantly slower than set.update(empty_list_expression). I double checked my fi