[issue29716] Python 3 Module doc still sounds like __init__.py is required

James O added the comment: Ah, I didn't realize some tools depended on it. Should I set the status to closed? (like I said, I'm new to this) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.o

[issue29716] Python 3 Module doc still sounds like __init__.py is required

New submission from James O: PEP 420 says "Allowing implicit namespace packages means that the requirement to provide an __init__.py file can be dropped completely..." (as described here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37139786/is-init-py-not-required-for-packages-in-pyth