Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@Larry and Terry:
I want to stay out of this discussion or participation on Python development
for the future as I've expressed it elsewhere
(https://bugs.python.org/issue34660#msg325515). However, I want to address the
unfair treatment of my perso
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@terry.reed:
I politely ask you: Please use my proper first name if you refer to me and
please don't call me an extremist (like here
https://bugs.python.org/msg325802). Feel free to criticize my opinion but don't
put labels on me. We don't
Change by Gabriel Marko :
--
nosy: -suic
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34605>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Gabriel Marko :
--
nosy: -suic
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34660>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Gabriel Marko :
--
nosy: -suic
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34694>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@terry.reedy
> Gabriel, I believe I addressed most your concerns in my previous post.
I don't think so (see below) but we don't have to agree in everything. :)
> Are you are suggesting that we judge proposals _by the proposer_, rather than
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@terry.reedy: By madness I meant:
1. blank replacement of words without relevant justification. Collecting 5
links and labelling some words as pejorative or ist or do it for
“diversity reasons” etc. is no justification. I have no problem with changing
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@serhiy.storchaka: IMO, the problem isn't the master/slave terminology itself
but the way how the changes were introduced (no discussion) and the
justification ("diversity reasons"???).
IMO this is the next level: https://bugs.python.org/i
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@Mariatta:
> There will be no further discussion about this.
Repeating this over and over again won't solve the (any) issue. This madness
reached another level here: https://bugs.python.org/issue34660. That was
exactly my point here: https://bugs.py
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
Come on guys. Stop this madness. :(
--
nosy: +suic
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34660>
___
___
Python-bug
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
The discussion under GH PRs is now censored. What will be the next level?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@cheryl.sabella let me challenge some points in your arguments:
> Based on that, I don't think it's fair to blame Victor for bringing it up for
> discussion.
Ok, but where was the discussion? @vstinner didn't even make a point and
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@mcepl: I completely agree with you that we shouldn't waste time with this. I
would be better not to dig into the discussion about "master-slave"
terminology. IMO we don't even need to go into that as the problem here is more
substan
Gabriel Marko added the comment:
@vstinner:
> For diversity reasons, it would be nice to try to avoid "master" and "slave"
> terminology which can be associated to slavery.
This is too vague. Define what "diversity reasons" are and elaborate your
point.
14 matches
Mail list logo
