[issue1466] Special reporting of NotImplementedError in unittest

2007-11-19 Thread Erik Andersén
Erik Andersén added the comment: No, I definitely don't want to ignore them, I want them reported in a manner that is relevant to them. Just say that the test was not implemented. No tracebacks for debugging since there is nothing to debug. In addition to a TestRunner I need a new TestCas

[issue1466] Special reporting of NotImplementedError in unittest

2007-11-19 Thread Erik Andersén
Erik Andersén added the comment: Possible, but cumbersome. You have to analyze each case and see if it depends on code not written. When you implement a new piece of code, you have to go through all your tests to see if that one should be included. Also you don't get any reporting o

[issue1466] Special reporting of NotImplementedError in unittest

2007-11-19 Thread Erik Andersén
Erik Andersén added the comment: Raghuram Devarakonda skrev: > Raghuram Devarakonda added the comment: > > I don't think unittest automatically treats all exceptions as failures. > Failures are those that are explicitly flagged with assert* and fail* > methods. All other

[issue1466] Special reporting of NotImplementedError in unittest

2007-11-19 Thread Erik Andersén
New submission from Erik Andersén: When a unittest test case raises an Exception, that test case is considered a failure. However, raising NotImplementedError is not a failure. It is something completely normal during development and simply indicates that the functionality has not yet been