Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
Hello friends,
@vinay.sajip - the use case for this feature is actually something I come
across fairly often.
In an application I have dozens and hundreds of logger instances. However, they
all fall into one of several loggers.
Most of the instances are
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
> I'm not sure people depend on getpeercert() returning None before the
> handshake is done, or perhaps by accident?
Ah, no, I meant that people may depend on the documented behaviour of
.getpeercert's returning an empty dict (which I mixed u
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
> None isn't helpful as it could mean other things.
This is another story but yes, it's true. API-wise, None should be returned in
one situation only - we're on server side, ca_certs is non-CERT_NONE,
do_handshake has been called yet
New submission from Dariusz Suchojad:
Hello,
I'd like to suggest adding a simple note to SSLSocket.getpeercert stating that
it will always return None if do_handshake has never been called.
This is not the default behaviour, by default SSLSocket.__init__'s
do_handshake_on_connect
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
I find that _AttributeHolder is a handy way for passing the command line
options around the application. What is lacks though is a documented API for
actually fetching the attributes in batches, like .items() or something similar
that could be used for
New submission from Dariusz Suchojad :
Hello,
I was wondering if it were possible for the
argparse._AttributeHolder._get_kwargs to become a part of the public API.
Using this method is a very convenient way to get a hold of the arguments
provided by the user and it would be shame to keep it
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
Hello,
funny the bug report should surface in the very same time I was looking
for a way to put 2 authors in the 'author' field :-)
[Antoine Pitrou (pitrou)]
> It is still unknown what use case the new "author" scheme would solve
>
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
I think we can close the issue (although I seem not be able to do that).
The installer works just fine now I've downloaded it using another
browser. For future reference - the former one was Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;
U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9)
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
Hmm, on a home PC the checksum's correct, it's
a1d1a9c07bc4c78bd8fa05dd3efec87f. Assuming something is wrong with
my download at work, is it possible for an MSI package to start the
installation even when package is corrupted?
Anyway, tomorrow I
Dariusz Suchojad added the comment:
Done. Attached in python.zip. I've also noticed something strange here.
http://python.org/download/releases/2.5.1/ says the MD5 sum should
be a1d1a9c07bc4c78bd8fa05dd3efec87f but the MD5 client I'm using
(http://www.pc-tools.net/win32/md5sums/) te
New submission from Dariusz Suchojad:
Hello,
for some reasons I cannot install Python 2.5.1 using the default MSI
package which may be found here
http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.5.1/python-2.5.1.msi. This only
happens on two of my PC's at work but I cannot reproduce it at home.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
