Change by Danish Prakash :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +10276
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31823>
___
___
Py
Danish Prakash added the comment:
I'd like to work on this.
I get that the 3.7+ doc still has the irrelevant change from 3.6 which needs to
be removed but I'm not sure what's wrong with the 3.6 doc.
> The signature is indeed awkward for 3.6,
--
no
Danish Prakash added the comment:
Sorry for bumping this thread but Victor, could you please share your inputs on
this if you have the time for it, thanks.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Danish Prakash added the comment:
I would like to work on this if nobody else has.
--
nosy: +danishprakash
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue20
Danish Prakash added the comment:
I would like to work on this if you have not already started, Steve.
> We should check whether people read from
> SimpleHTTPRequestHandler.extensions_map directly before calling guess_type(),
> and decide how quickly we can make the change.
Change by Danish Prakash :
--
pull_requests: +9283
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34901>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Danish Prakash :
--
pull_requests: +9150
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue12345>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Danish Prakash added the comment:
You're right Karthikeyan, although I personally think that returning ['-s',
'-E', '-I'] should be a plausible solution here since it has been stated
explicitly that it implies '-s' and '-E' but I'
Danish Prakash added the comment:
> I expect to get: ['-I'] instead of ['-s', '-E', '-I']
>From what I understand, this can be done in one of two ways. First, we could
>edit
>https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/ad73a9cf9777002366
Danish Prakash added the comment:
Thanks for the concise explanation, that makes sense.
> Also there will be no binary releases and only source releases for security
> only branches.
Is there any particular reason as to why this happens? IS it just to make it
easier for the team to
Danish Prakash added the comment:
thank you for for making the corrections, however, what's with a version being
in security fixes mode? I would like to read more about that.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Danish Prakash added the comment:
Linking this[1] here in case someone else stumbles upon this thread. I've
created an issue and a PR for the documentation issue regarding the absence of
-I flag from the sys.flags table which came into picture from the discussions
in this thread
Change by Danish Prakash :
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
nosy: danishprakash, docs@python
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Missing isolated (-I) flag in sys.flags table
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
Danish Prakash added the comment:
Thank you Karthikeyan, I'm going to take care of both of these issues.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Danish Prakash added the comment:
> With respect to documentation I was talking about '-I' not being documented
> in the table at https://docs.python.org/3.7/library/sys.html#sys.flags though
> it's present in the C code and in sys.flags.isolated.
Thanks for brin
Danish Prakash added the comment:
Serhiy, why should __qualname__ always be used together with __module__? I
can't seem to find a valid reason, I've been through the pep.
--
nosy: +prakashdanish
___
Python tracker
<https://bu
Change by Danish Prakash :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +8462
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34443>
___
___
Py
Danish Prakash added the comment:
I would like to work on this, just making sure you are not.
--
nosy: +prakashdanish
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Change by Danish Prakash :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +8301
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34426>
___
___
Py
Danish Prakash added the comment:
@pablogsal I would love to fix this up
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34426>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Danish Prakash added the comment:
> however it seems to be wrong, "__ltrace__" is correct
just curious how did you figure it out?
--
nosy: +prakashdanish
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.pytho
Change by Danish Prakash :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +8292
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34365>
___
___
Py
Danish Prakash added the comment:
> But in 3.x, comparison no longer falls back to comparing object addresses.
What is the default fallback in 3.x?
--
nosy: +prakashdanish
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
23 matches
Mail list logo