Daniel Stokes added the comment:
I have uploaded a new patch with the suggested changes, thanks for the review.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42908/loopback_fast_path_v3.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26
Daniel Stokes added the comment:
I have added a zip containing a simple server and client to test the patch
with. With loopback fast path enabled, I get 3-5x more throughput on my Windows
10 computer with an AMD 900 series chipset.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42895
Daniel Stokes added the comment:
Thank you for the review. I have made the changes suggested in the code and I
have uploaded a new patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42888/loopback_fast_path_v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<h
Daniel Stokes added the comment:
The "Lifecycle of a Patch" document recommends pinging an issue after a month
of no review. I do not see any special ping option, so I am assuming that means
to post a comment.
To help with code review I tried to keep this change very similar to
New submission from Daniel Stokes:
Adding the SIO_LOOPBACK_FAST_PATH option to socket.ioctl on Windows allows
Windows users to enable the loopback fast path option available on Windows 8+.
This allows for much better TCP loopback performance on Windows.
For more information on TCP Loopback
