[issue12005] modulo result of Decimal differs from float/int

New submission from Daniel Albeseder : I know that the modulo operation for negative values is not well defined, but I would at least expect that the result is the same no matter if you use ints, floats or decimals. However Decimal seem to behave else than the builtin types. Python 3.1.2

[issue9182] document “--” as a way to disti nguish option w/ narg='+' from positional argument in arg parse

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: Steven: The last part I guess would belong better in issue 9334. Using a "--" to end all optionals is just a convention but "--" could also be the argument to some option as well. We need to limit this in any way, and the way it is done

[issue9182] document “--” as a way to disti nguish option w/ narg='+' from positional argument in arg parse

Changes by Daniel Albeseder : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19732/issue9182.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9182> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue9182] document “--” as a way to disti nguish option w/ narg='+' from positional argument in arg parse

Changes by Daniel Albeseder : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file19731/issue9182.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9182> ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue9182] document “--” as a way to disti nguish option w/ narg='+' from positional argument in arg parse

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: Added more unit tests for testing the help text as well as the functionality of the "--" separator. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19731/issue9182.patch ___ Python trac

[issue9182] document “--” as a way to disti nguish option w/ narg='+' from positional argument in arg parse

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: Steven: From msg121850 I think the last two examples do not need the "--". Since there are no positional arguments, the "--" is not needed. However the following additional cases exist: -x X [X ...] -y Y -- A B # since optionals might

[issue10469] test_socket fails using Visual Studio 2010

Changes by Daniel Albeseder : -- title: test_socket fails -> test_socket fails using Visual Studio 2010 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue10469] test_socket fails

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: Ok I did switched the preference for all "new" defines inside VC++ errno.h to use the WSA* alternatives if available. Now test_socket passes for me, and the test_asyncore which did block before, now passes without a problem. -- Added

[issue10469] test_socket fails

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: Only in the "system_error" file. (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee372194.aspx) Seem to be a C++0X standard header file. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5814770t.aspx talks about the Posix codes only for compatibili

[issue10469] test_socket fails

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\include\errno.h The content of my errno.h: ... #define EILSEQ 42 #define STRUNCATE 80 #endif #endif /* Support EDEADLOCK for compatibility with older MS-C versions */ #define EDEADLOCK

[issue10469] test_socket fails

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: #define EWOULDBLOCK 140 #define WSAEWOULDBLOCK 10035L The editor suggests that EWOULDBLOCK is already defined, therefore its code is used, i.e. 140. #define ECONNREFUSED107 #define WSAECONNREFUSED 10061L The E

[issue9182] document “--” as a way to disti nguish option w/ narg='+' from positional argument in arg parse

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: I did the patch for adding the "--" in the generated usage text inside issue 9338. -- nosy: +Kotan ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.

[issue9338] argparse optionals with nargs='+' can't be followed by positionals

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: My attached patch adds the "--" between the optionals and the arguments, if there are optionals which have variable length and at least some positional argument can be provided. Patch is for python 3.2 svn revision 86553. -- nosy: +K

[issue10469] test_socket fails

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: As this was requested on IRC, I put the Visual C++ 2010 Express solution and project files here as well. The patch "pcbuild_vs2010.patch" should be applied to the PCbuild directory. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org

[issue10453] Add -h/--help option to compileall

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: I wanted to test, that no unwanted output is given before the usage. I just added the test before I started to try to fix this bug, as I recognized Michele already was already fixing the bug. This was just my test-driven approach, where the unit test

[issue10453] Add -h/--help option to compileall

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: I did a very simple addition to the CommandLineTest, to check that "-h" really returns the "usage:". I am not sure, if this is useful since, it rather tests argparse now with the proposed patch... -- nosy: +Kotan Added file: ht

[issue10469] test_socket fails

Daniel Albeseder added the comment: current revision = svn revision 86553 -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10469> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue10469] test_socket fails

New submission from Daniel Albeseder : Using WinXP I compiled python 3.2 from the current sources using Visual C++ 2010 Express. Running rt -v test_socket resulted in the attached output. The tests testSmallReadNonBlocking and testWriteNonBlocking have errors, and an assertion fails for