Anton Tyurin added the comment:
According to man send:
only sendmsg() if input length argument overflows a ssize_t on OS X. But
truncating extradata in sendall() without exception is bad idea, because
sendall() never returns count of successfully sent bytes. So we'll never know
Anton Tyurin added the comment:
I could be wrong, but:
ssize_t
send(int socket, const void *buffer, size_t length, int flags);
so length is size_t, but Py_ssize_t is ssize_t (signed to unsigned).
PS. sorry for my bad English
--
___
Python tracker
Anton Tyurin added the comment:
There seems to be no, because there's this bug is already fixed in Python 3,
according to
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/c1a400501db6/Modules/socketmodule.c#l3290.
But the use of Py_ssize_t (len and n) hides the potential type conve
Anton Tyurin added the comment:
This issue is similar like http://bugs.python.org/issue9566.
It seems reasonable to apply a similar fix.
But why not use the types described in the signature functions in
. In particular use for len size_t, and for n - ssize_t
Anton Tyurin added the comment:
typo fix
8bite -> 8 bytes
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18100>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Anton Tyurin added the comment:
The same error in the use of socket.send(). Is it possible to use size_t for
len instead of int?
According to http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353/ Py_ssize_t on x86 is
typedef for int, and size_t has the same size.
On x64 sizeof size_t is 8bit, that covers