李超然 added the comment:
Thank you Tim Peters for replying to me. I tried your demo and it is a proof
exactly I want. It did prove that there is no memory issue. And I tried to
modify my own code and showed the same result. I will close this issue.
--
resolution: -> not a bug
st
李超然 added the comment:
Sorry, I don't know what I can do about it. In my perspective, I think there is
a memory leak because monitor software have provided proof for me to believe
that.
I have provided a script to reproduce this issue. I think that is enough for
developers to conduct
李超然 added the comment:
Okay. I know this is complicated. So how can I make sure this is not an issue?
Can you provide some steps or a bash script to prove that the memory increment
issue does not exist? I'm now not being persuaded because I don't know how to
prove there is no issue
李超然 added the comment:
You mean if I have a machine that has 16GB RAM, and the maximum shared memory
size is 8GB. I then create two processes to write to this shared memory, and
the system won't run out of memory. Is it right?
I can try this experiment later on. But I can not understand
New submission from 李超然 :
We find an issue while using shared memory. When opening another process to
overwrite the shared memory, the memory of this process will increase to about
the size of this shared memory. So when several processes try to read or write
the shared memory, there will be
