[Bug 264993] www/mitmproxy: Update to 12.1.1

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264993 p5b2ea8...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|www/mitmproxy: Update to|www/mitmproxy: Update to

[Bug 286954] ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: poudriere bulk -b latest fails to fetch all packages available from the repo

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286954 Michael Osipov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||micha...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[package - 142i386-default][math/py-numpy] Failed for py312-numpy-1.26.4_6,1 in stage

You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: python@FreeBSD.org Log URL: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy21/data/142i386-default/a269b1a83999

[package - 142amd64-default][math/py-numpy] Failed for py312-numpy-1.26.4_6,1 in stage

You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: python@FreeBSD.org Log URL: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy22/data/142amd64-default/a269b1a8399

[Bug 286908] devel/mercurial: update to 7.0.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286908 Sergey A. Osokin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|devel/mercurial: update to |devel/mercurial: update to

[Bug 286908] devel/mercurial: update to 7.0.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286908 --- Comment #3 from Sergey A. Osokin --- (In reply to Sergey A. Osokin from comment #1) Please note: the patch may be incomplete, and is required testing with poudiere(8). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 286908] devel/mercurial: update to 7.0.2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286908 Sergey A. Osokin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #260509|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 286954] ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: poudriere bulk -b latest fails to fetch all packages available from the repo

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286954 --- Comment #6 from p5b2ea8...@t-online.de --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5) > Don't expect an upstream maintainer to react on downstream issues. Well, except this case is not about an arbitrary upstream maintainer. And Poudr

[Bug 286954] ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: 3.4.99.20250209 poudriere bulk -b latest fails to fetch all packages available

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286954 --- Comment #4 from p5b2ea8...@t-online.de --- (In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #3) Are FreeBSD people abandoning FreeBSD infrastructure and FreeBSD services like bugzilla? I prefer not to! If a maintainer does not respond here on bug

[Bug 286954] ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: poudriere bulk -b latest fails to fetch all packages available from the repo

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286954 p5b2ea8...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: |ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel:

[package - 142i386-quarterly][math/py-numpy] Failed for py312-numpy-1.26.4_6,1 in stage

You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: python@FreeBSD.org Log URL: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy19/data/142i386-quarterly/f0c08e9746

[Bug 286954] ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: poudriere bulk -b latest fails to fetch all packages available from the repo

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286954 --- Comment #7 from Kurt Jaeger --- (In reply to p5B2EA84B3 from comment #6) This argument and personal attack ('not fit for the job') holds no water and is a good way to demotivate folks.The bug might be annoying, but it's not fatal. The t

[Bug 286954] ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel: poudriere bulk -b latest fails to fetch all packages available from the repo

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286954 --- Comment #8 from Kurt Jaeger --- (In reply to p5B2EA84B3 from comment #4) What would 'returning to the pool' help ? Self-sabotage ? Applying rules in strict manners, ignoring the downstream effects is not the way to manage any project.