On 7/20/23 00:32, Charlie Li wrote:
John W. O'Brien wrote:
For net-mgmt/py-pysmi, I also had to patch pyproject.toml [2] to match
the port name [3].
[2] https://github.com/lextudio/pysnmp/blob/v5.0.28/pyproject.toml#L2
[3]
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/diff/net-mgmt/py-pysmi/files/patch-pypr
On 2023-07-20 20:02, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> On 7/20/23 00:32, Charlie Li wrote:
>> John W. O'Brien wrote:
>>> For net-mgmt/py-pysmi, I also had to patch pyproject.toml [2] to match the
>>> port name [3].
>>>
>>> [2] https://github.com/lextudio/pysnmp/blob/v5.0.28/pyproject.toml#L2
>>> [3]
>>> h
On 7/20/23 09:30, Alastair Hogge wrote:
On 2023-07-20 20:02, John W. O'Brien wrote:
On 7/20/23 00:32, Charlie Li wrote:
John W. O'Brien wrote:
For net-mgmt/py-pysmi, I also had to patch pyproject.toml [2] to match the port
name [3].
[2] https://github.com/lextudio/pysnmp/blob/v5.0.28/pyproje
John W. O'Brien wrote:
Do we expect that Lextudio's PEP 541 request to take over the PyPI
package names is going to be denied? If not, it means we expect the
upstream source names to change to match the current port names, and
renaming now will require renaming again later. I struggle to see ho
On 7/20/23 10:41, Charlie Li wrote:
John W. O'Brien wrote:
Do we expect that Lextudio's PEP 541 request to take over the PyPI
package names is going to be denied? If not, it means we expect the
upstream source names to change to match the current port names, and
renaming now will require renam
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272560
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Not A Bug
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271116
russ...@russerver.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||russ...@russerver.org
--- C
