[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-12-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 Mikhail T. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freebsd-2024@virtual-estate

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-07-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #16 from Charlie Li --- (In reply to Po-Chuan Hsieh from comment #15) While maintainer should be doing their due diligence wrt correct *_DEPENDS version specifiers when present, maintainers of dependencies and consumers still ne

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-07-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 Po-Chuan Hsieh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunp...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-07-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #14 from Charlie Li --- Build now broken because devel/py-gast updated to 0.6.0, which is a devel/py-pythran dependency. The current pythran does not support gast 0.6 at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-06-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #13 from Wen Heping --- result of regression test: == short test summary info === FAILED optimize/tests/test_optimize.py::TestOptimizeWrapp

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-06-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #12 from Charlie Li --- I would like to do some further Makefile verification and comparison with my own copy, especially with how conservative upstream is with dependency version specifications. Also still need to runtime test

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-06-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #11 from Wen Heping --- Since meson-python had been updated, now this PR could be committed. If no objection, I shall commit this PR later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-05-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #10 from Charlie Li --- Note: latest upstream version is now 1.13.1 but that series uses the coming soon numpy 2.0, a major breaking update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-05-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #9 from Charlie Li --- Unless we can verify that scipy usage/output in consumers are giving the correct results, beyond any exp-run (which hardly verifies anything beyond package or bdist wheel building), we need to get the test

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-05-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 --- Comment #8 from wen --- (In reply to Charlie Li from comment #7) Would you list the failure caused by this patch, then we know what to do next. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 277826] [exp-run]science/py-scipy: Update to 1.12.0

2024-05-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277826 Charlie Li changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|y...@freebsd.org|python@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiv