subject:"\[Bug 260741\] security\/py\-gssapi\: Update to 1.7.2"

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2022-02-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 Guangyuan Yang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2022-02-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 --- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=05b7e3cafd96d3f91ef928be712ead113bc7e445 commit 05b7e3cafd96d3f91ef928be712ead113bc7e445 Author:

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2022-02-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 Guangyuan Yang changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ports-b...@freebsd.org |y...@freebsd.org -- You are rece

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2021-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 John W. O'Brien changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #230474|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2021-12-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 --- Comment #4 from Guangyuan Yang --- (In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #3) I understand. If it doesn't build against 3.11, IMO we should limit the upper bound - and I believe that you are already tracking the supported versions p

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2021-12-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 --- Comment #3 from John W. O'Brien --- (In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #2) I take it back. This port does *not* build successfully against 3.11. I am working on updates to two different ports, and got this one confused with the

[Bug 260741] security/py-gssapi: Update to 1.7.2

2021-12-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260741 --- Comment #2 from John W. O'Brien --- (In reply to Guangyuan Yang from comment #1) Since this port builds successfully against 3.11.0a3, my preference is to omit an upper bound on the python version. Upstream is unlikely to make support