[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 Alessandro Sagratini changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(ale_sa |maintainer-feedback+

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 Alessandro Sagratini changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #229243|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 259445] devel/py-setuptools_scm: Update to 6.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259445 Kai Knoblich changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||258033 Referenced Bugs: https://b

[Bug 258033] devel/py-b2sdk: Update to 1.12.0

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258033 Kai Knoblich changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-patch, needs-qa | Blocks|

[Bug 258033] devel/py-b2sdk: Update to 1.12.0

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258033 Kai Knoblich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #227419|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 --- Comment #9 from Yasuhiro Kimura --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #8) OK, I understand your intention now. However, please use comment rather than maintainer-feedback flag next time you face same situation. It's not intuitive

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Yasuhiro Kimura from comment #7) We don't have non-maintainer feedback flags (yet) to request feedback or loop in arbitrary people (without CC'ing them). I added you for feedback given po

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 --- Comment #7 from Yasuhiro Kimura --- @koobs Why did you request maintainer feedback to me? I'm not maintainer of this port. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 259279] sysutils/py-salt: 3004 fails to run: Requirement.parse('pyzmq<22.0.0,>=17.0.0'), {'salt'})

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259279 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-qa| Flags|maintainer-fee

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Alessandro Sagratini from comment #3) Python ports are declarative, not imperative, in that they declare what versions the package supports, rather than specifying or choosing a version.

[Bug 259279] sysutils/py-salt: 3004 fails to run: Requirement.parse('pyzmq<22.0.0,>=17.0.0'), {'salt'})

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259279 --- Comment #13 from a...@ish.com.au --- This was resolved for me by this patch: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=ddffa24d1a494a4354d84b553f08f493e0220c11 Whether salt upstream fixes it for the next release in six months is irrele

[Bug 259279] sysutils/py-salt: 3004 fails to run: Requirement.parse('pyzmq<22.0.0,>=17.0.0'), {'salt'})

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259279 --- Comment #12 from Kubilay Kocak --- And could you point us to upstream (issue, pr, commit) references -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 259279] sysutils/py-salt: 3004 fails to run: Requirement.parse('pyzmq<22.0.0,>=17.0.0'), {'salt'})

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259279 --- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Kirill Ponomarev from comment #10) If the port/package is currently affected, is this actually resolved? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 259637] math/py-numpy: Update to 1.21.3

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259637 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-qa CC|

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 259637] math/py-numpy: Update to 1.21.3

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-python (Nobody) for maintainer-feedback: Bug 259637: math/py-numpy: Update to 1.21.3 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259637 --- Description --- - Update to 1.21.3 - Build with python-3.10 - Update TEST_DEPENDS numpy-1.21.3 require pytest

[Bug 259637] math/py-numpy: Update to 1.21.3

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259637 Bug ID: 259637 Summary: math/py-numpy: Update to 1.21.3 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affect

[Bug 259567] devel/py-jsonschema: Version returns 0.0.0, breaking net-im/py-matrix-synapse which runs a version check

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259567 Muhammad Moinur Rahman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Flags|

[Bug 259567] devel/py-jsonschema: Version returns 0.0.0, breaking net-im/py-matrix-synapse which runs a version check

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259567 --- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=9913762ef61e311938e87a588aa427bbee65a74d commit 9913762ef61e311938e87a588aa427bbee65a74d Author:

[Bug 259279] sysutils/py-salt: 3004 fails to run: Requirement.parse('pyzmq<22.0.0,>=17.0.0'), {'salt'})

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259279 Kirill Ponomarev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 Alessandro Sagratini changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #229242|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 Alessandro Sagratini changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #229176|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 259579] devel/py-circuitbreaker: Update to 1.3.2

2021-11-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259579 --- Comment #3 from Alessandro Sagratini --- Hello @koobs, I am working on making requested changes to the patch, but I have a question: * you said "Note: Additional dependency on ["typing; python_version < '3.5'"]": does this change make

Ports with version numbers going backwards: devel/py-pytest, devel/py-pytest...

2021-11-03 Thread erwin
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention