[Bug 258352] devel/mercurial: Update to 5.9.1

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258352 --- Comment #4 from Xin LI --- hg2svn portion looked fine to me (IMO you don't really need to seek for approval for large scale changes like this, but thanks for reaching out) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee f

[Bug 258352] devel/mercurial: Update to 5.9.1

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258352 --- Comment #3 from Gleb Popov --- tortoisehg changes are fine by me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 258352] devel/mercurial: Update to 5.9.1

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258352 --- Comment #2 from Sergey A. Osokin --- Created attachment 227908 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=227908&action=edit [PATCH] devel/mercurial: update to 5.9.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the a

[Bug 258352] devel/mercurial: Update to 5.9.1

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258352 Sergey A. Osokin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||o...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 257073] www/mitmproxy: Fails to build after py-asgiref 3.4.1 upgrade

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||258500 Referenced Bugs: https://

[Bug 257073] www/mitmproxy: Fails to build after py-asgiref 3.4.1 upgrade

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073 p5b2e9...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Op

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-09-14 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Ports with version numbers going backwards: biology/py-PySCeS, devel/py-pyte...

2021-09-14 Thread erwin
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention

[Bug 257073] www/mitmproxy: Fails to build after py-asgiref 3.4.1 upgrade

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073 --- Comment #10 from p5b2e9...@t-online.de --- The port still does not build: === = env: USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY=1 USER=root UID=0 GID=0 ===> mitmproxy-6.0.2 depends on package: py38-asg

Re: python38-3.8.11 is vulnerable

2021-09-14 Thread LuMiWa via python
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:55:19 +1000 Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 12/09/2021 11:17 pm, LuMiWa via python wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I start using latest binary packages and my questuions if is better > > to use ports for some port in this case for Pythong because ports > > as I know I faster update for v

[Bug 251626] math/py-numpy: Update to 1.20.3 (compatible with Python 3.9)

2021-09-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251626 Yuri Victorovich changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||258493 Referenced Bugs: https