On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:04 PM, DeLano Scientific wrote:
> Anders,
>
> Yes, we do have a long list of suggestions for PyMOL improvements, but many
> of them require a detailed understanding of PyMOL's fragile C-language
> internals, the study and modification of which is too much for Summer of
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM, DeLano Scientific wrote:
> So from where I sit, the obvious open-source candidates are:
>
> APBS (electrostatics -- improve the current plugin)
Please let me know if anyone decides to do this. I have an
(unreleased) improved version, and several ideas for how to
