Re: [PyMOL] Question on residue selection in multiple PDB

2023-07-20 Thread Neena Susan Eappen
Thank you so much Jarrett, yes it works very well! On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 08:51, Jarrett Johnson < jarrett.john...@schrodinger.com> wrote: > Sorry, typo. For the second approach, state should be `i + 1` and not `-1`" > > Jarrett J. > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:49 AM Jarrett Johnson < > jarrett.j

Re: [PyMOL] Question on residue selection in multiple PDB

2023-07-20 Thread Jarrett Johnson
Sorry, typo. For the second approach, state should be `i + 1` and not `-1`" Jarrett J. On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:49 AM Jarrett Johnson < jarrett.john...@schrodinger.com> wrote: > Hi Neena, > > Is the split_states necessary? You can query the distance between atoms on > the state-level as well wi

Re: [PyMOL] Question on residue selection in multiple PDB

2023-07-20 Thread Jarrett Johnson
Hi Neena, Is the split_states necessary? You can query the distance between atoms on the state-level as well without having to break up your structure. Here's two approaches that show either way; I recommend the second if possible. You'll of course have to switch out the selection string to fit yo

Re: [PyMOL] Question on residue selection in multiple PDB

2023-07-19 Thread Neena Susan Eappen
Hello PyMOL users, Can I get some insight on how to approach this analysis? Many thanks, Neena On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 18:54, Neena Susan Eappen wrote: > Hello PyMOL Team, > > I am studying a protein called Trp-cage (PDB code: 1L2Y); this PDB has 38 > NMR structures deposited in it. > Using spli