RE: [PyMOL] combine distance objects

2005-03-09 Thread Warren DeLano
.net > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of PyMOL-users digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > >1. Re: combine distance objects (Robert Campbell) > >2

RE: [PyMOL] combine distance objects

2005-03-08 Thread Garcia, Tzintzuni I.
- From: pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Michael George Lerner Sent: Tue 3/8/2005 10:42 AM To: Robert Campbell Cc: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PyMOL] combine distance objects On Tue, 8

Re: [PyMOL] combine distance objects

2005-03-08 Thread Michael George Lerner
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Robert Campbell wrote: Hi, Daniel Farrell [Monday, March 07, 2005 1:23 PM] wrote: I want to create a lot of distance objects (in the hundreds) between particular atomic pairs. Obviously I can make a script like the following, inserting the exact atomic selections that I

[Re: [PyMOL] combine distance objects]

2005-03-08 Thread Viktor Hornak
Robert Campbell wrote: Hi, Daniel Farrell [Monday, March 07, 2005 1:23 PM] wrote: I want to create a lot of distance objects (in the hundreds) between particular atomic pairs. Obviously I can make a script like the following, inserting the exact atomic selections that I want: distance d

Re: [PyMOL] combine distance objects

2005-03-08 Thread Robert Campbell
Hi, > Daniel Farrell [Monday, March 07, 2005 1:23 PM] wrote: > > > > I want to create a lot of distance objects (in the hundreds) > > between particular atomic pairs. Obviously I can make a > > script like the following, inserting the exact atomic > > selections that I want: > > > > distance

RE: [PyMOL] combine distance objects

2005-03-07 Thread Warren DeLano
Daniel, This is a reasonable request, but no, it isn't possible right now -- sorry. If it isn't necessary to be able to turn the distances on and off, then you can name them using a preceeding underscore "_" so that they are omitted from the object list. Cheers, Warren -- Warren L. DeLano, Ph.