Re: [PyMOL] new "metals" keyword

2013-09-11 Thread Thomas Holder
Hi Spencer, thanks for the feedback. Do you know the "organic" keyword? This should usually match what you consider the ligand. It will not distinguish between covalently bound and not covalently bound, though. select ligand, organic & !(bymol polymer) select ptm, organic & (bymol polymer) Chee

Re: [PyMOL] new "metals" keyword

2013-09-10 Thread Spencer Bliven
Excellent! I had previously been using things like 'not elem c+n+o+h+s' in my scripts. Using 'metal' will match my intent much better. 'Sidechain' will be appreciated as well. I would suggest 'ligand' and 'ptm' selectors to distinguish nonbonded and covalently bonded hetatms. Although I'm not sure

Re: [PyMOL] new "metals" keyword

2013-09-08 Thread Thomas Holder
Greetings, we added "backbone", "bb." and "sidechain", "sc." keywords (SVN rev 4041). They select polymer (protein and nucleic acid) backbone and sidechain atoms, based on PDB atom names. The internal GUI menu items with "main chain" and "side chain" use the new keyword, which adds nucleic acid su

Re: [PyMOL] new "metals" keyword

2013-08-14 Thread Robert Hanson
see http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/#atomproperties for several suggestions. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Holder < thomas.hol...@schrodinger.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > this is a quick announcement that we added the "metals" keyword to the > selection language (SVN code revisio

[PyMOL] new "metals" keyword

2013-08-13 Thread Thomas Holder
Greetings, this is a quick announcement that we added the "metals" keyword to the selection language (SVN code revision 4039). Since PyMOL's selection language is one of the powerful core features that make so many complex tasks so easy, we plan to add more useful keywords and operators. For exam