Mr. Thomas Holder,
Many thanks for your help.
I can manage it.
Best regards,
Koji
2019年6月26日(水) 18:56 Thomas Holder :
> Hi Koji,
>
> Yes it is my understanding that sphere_scale 1.1932 would correspond to
> 30% probability.
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
> > On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:26 PM, koji naka
Hi Koji,
Yes it is my understanding that sphere_scale 1.1932 would correspond to 30%
probability.
Cheers,
Thomas
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 12:26 PM, koji naka wrote:
>
> Dear Mr. Thomas Holder,
>
> Thank you very much for your kind reply.
> I am very happy to know the scale factor for the 50%
Dear Mr. Thomas Holder,
Thank you very much for your kind reply.
I am very happy to know the scale factor for the 50% probability, but I
don't understand well.
>From the table, can I take a value the scale? For example, in case of 30%
probability, is it ok to set " set sphere_scale, 1.1932"? or n
Hi Koji,
Interesting question, I wasn't aware of the ellipsoid_probability setting.
The probability to radius conversion is done with a lookup table, see:
https://github.com/schrodinger/pymol-open-source/blob/d1359f125d/layer2/RepEllipsoid.cpp#L114
To get sphere scaling equivalent of ellipsoid_p
Dear all,
The size of isotropic atoms plotted by using "alter all, vdw =
sqrt(b/8)/pi" and "show sphere" looks small compared with the size of
anisotropic atoms displayed by "show ellipsoid" in PyMOL default setting
with 50% probability.
How can I plot the isotropic atoms with 50% probability?
T
