Re: [PyMOL] Intel Video - Please Respond

2012-05-03 Thread Jason Vertrees
Michael, The next tarball I upload will probably be for v1.5.2 or v1.6 depending on progress. That is a few months away. We will continue to push minor changes in the meantime. Cheers, -- Jason On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:35AM -

Re: [PyMOL] Intel Video - Please Respond

2012-05-02 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:35AM -0400, Jason Vertrees wrote: > The latest commit (3995) should fix this for the Intel card. Try > pulling the latest (3996) from the open source branch. That worked splendidly, I am uploading pymol-1.5.0.1 with some subversion changesets to Debian now. Are

Re: [PyMOL] Intel Video - Please Respond

2012-04-09 Thread Jason Vertrees
Michael, The latest commit (3995) should fix this for the Intel card. Try pulling the latest (3996) from the open source branch. Cheers, -- Jason On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:01:11AM -0400, Jason Vertrees wrote: >> Due to the number

Re: [PyMOL] Intel Video - Please Respond

2012-04-09 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:01:11AM -0400, Jason Vertrees wrote: > Due to the number of problems that arise when rendering on Intel video > cards, we're going to automatically disable new rendering features if > an Intel video card is detected. You will be able to use PyMOL, but > with the olde

[PyMOL] Intel Video - Please Respond

2012-04-05 Thread Jason Vertrees
Greetings, Due to the number of problems that arise when rendering on Intel video cards, we're going to automatically disable new rendering features if an Intel video card is detected. You will be able to use PyMOL, but with the older, slower, uglier rendering. Also, you can override this autodete