* cheom-gil cheong [2003-02-27 12:37] wrote:
>
>
> I want to reduce the width of helices and the strands and the thickness of
> the strand to make better-looking figures. Does anyone did that before? It
> must be some setting parameters but I cannot find it in my manual.
Yes they are there, b
Dear All;
I want to reduce the width of helices and the strands and the thickness of
the strand to make better-looking figures. Does anyone did that before? It
must be some setting parameters but I cannot find it in my manual.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Cheom-Gil Cheong, Ph.D.
Research Associ
Dirk,
Your results are consistent with my experience.
SGIs fell behind PCs in price/performance long ago, and have been way
behind PCs in raw performance for at least the last couple of years
(except for high-end multiprocessing). This applies to both CPU and
graphics performance. The same can
> workstation (O2, Octane, Fuel, Onyx)? I've got an old Pentium III PC with 450
> MHz and a (non-stereo) Nvidia GeForce2 MX440 graphics card side-by-side with
> an SGI O2 with a R12000 processor: a simple pymol (0.86) movie of a protein
> sketch at 800x800 resolution and maximum display quality req
Dear pymol users,
in your experience, how does the graphical performance of pymol (or any other
graphical program) on a PC running under Linux with a good stereo-capable
graphics card (Nvidia Quadro, ATI FireGL) compare to a stereo-capable SGI
workstation (O2, Octane, Fuel, Onyx)? I've got an o
Dear PyMol user,
I've seen a cover illustration made using PyMol (Nucl. Acid. Res. february
issue 2003) and was exicited to see that is it possible to show missed residues
in a curved (!) dotted line manner. How one can achieve this? So far I thought
the way is to bridge the two ends of missed pro
