Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.1

2009-11-18 Thread Andi Vajda
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote: On 10 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote: I am pleased to announce the availability of Apache PyLucene 2.9.1. Thanks Andi! Unfortunately Lucence-3.0.0 breaks old scripts. E.g. make test fails with cd samples/LuceneInAction; PYTHONPATH=/Src/Src/Python/App/S

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.1

2009-11-18 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 10 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote: > > I am pleased to announce the availability of Apache PyLucene 2.9.1. > Thanks Andi! Unfortunately Lucence-3.0.0 breaks old scripts. E.g. make test fails with cd samples/LuceneInAction; PYTHONPATH=/Src/Src/Python/App/Searching/PyLucene/pylucene-build/build/test

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.1

2009-11-17 Thread Andi Vajda
On Nov 17, 2009, at 19:11, Bill Janssen wrote: So, you changed the name of the file containing patch.43, and that broke my build scripts. This whole "patch setuptools" thing is extremely fragile. Yep, it would be so simple to apply it upstream but I don't control that. How about defa

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.1

2009-11-17 Thread Andi Vajda
On Nov 17, 2009, at 19:11, Bill Janssen wrote: So, you changed the name of the file containing patch.43, and that broke my build scripts. Sorry, setuptools-0.6c10 needed a new version if the patch. The bug this patches was only filed a year ago. Andi.. This whole "patch setuptools"

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PyLucene 2.9.1

2009-11-17 Thread Bill Janssen
So, you changed the name of the file containing patch.43, and that broke my build scripts. This whole "patch setuptools" thing is extremely fragile. How about defaulting to NO_SHARED if you detect the absence of the patch? Or, better yet, take the patched code from setuptools to do the shared li