Re: AW: release votes

2014-05-02 Thread Dirk Rothe
Am 25.04.2014, 02:08 Uhr, schrieb Andi Vajda : On Apr 24, 2014, at 15:44, Robert Muir wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: I agree with you that making releases is important. However, when votes are called to actually make them, it's been hard to get voters to resp

Re: AW: release votes

2014-04-24 Thread Andi Vajda
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 15:44, Robert Muir wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: >> >> I agree with you that making releases is important. However, when votes are >> called to actually make them, it's been hard to get voters to respond. >> >> Anyone can vote. Anyone wit

Re: AW: release votes

2014-04-24 Thread Robert Muir
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > I agree with you that making releases is important. However, when votes are > called to actually make them, it's been hard to get voters to respond. > > Anyone can vote. Anyone with an interest should vote. Three PMC votes are > required to ma

Re: AW: release votes

2014-04-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Thomas Koch wrote: I don't agree that it is unimportant to make PyLucene releases. Without a ready-to-run software package the hurdles to use PyLucene are raised. It is already not quite simple (for beginners) to install PyLucene on the various platforms. Having a packaged

AW: release votes

2014-04-24 Thread Thomas Koch
Hi Andi, I don't agree that it is unimportant to make PyLucene releases. Without a ready-to-run software package the hurdles to use PyLucene are raised. It is already not quite simple (for beginners) to install PyLucene on the various platforms. Having a packaged release that is tested by some use