I agree this is not a release blocker -- +1 to release PyLucene 3.3.0-1.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
>> Am 03.07.2011 18:17, schrieb Andi Vajda:
>>>
>>> What kind of errors ?
>
Sorry, I should have included my errors 1st time around:
In file included from build/_lucene/__wrap03__.cpp:514:
build/_lucene/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/AbstractSecondPassGroupingCollector$SearchGroupDocs.h:55:
error: expected unqualified-id before '&' token
build/_lucene/org/apache/lucene
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 03.07.2011 18:17, schrieb Andi Vajda:
What kind of errors ?
So I added the grouping module to the PyLucene branch_3x build and it "just
built" (tm). I even committed the change to the build (rev 1142455) but I
didn't check that the grouping modul
Am 03.07.2011 18:17, schrieb Andi Vajda:
> What kind of errors ?
>
> So I added the grouping module to the PyLucene branch_3x build and it "just
> built" (tm). I even committed the change to the build (rev 1142455) but I
> didn't check that the grouping module was functional in PyLucene as I did
Hi Mike,
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Michael McCandless wrote:
Re-send, this time to pylucene-dev:
Everything looks good -- I was able to compile, run all tests
successfully, and run my usual smoke test (indexing & optimizing &
searching on first 100K wikipedia docs), but...
I then tried to enable
Re-send, this time to pylucene-dev:
Everything looks good -- I was able to compile, run all tests
successfully, and run my usual smoke test (indexing & optimizing &
searching on first 100K wikipedia docs), but...
I then tried to enable the grouping module (lucene/contrib/grouping),
by adding a GR
On Jul 2, 2011, at 15:20, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Without the third 0, how will you version critical patch releases should they
> be necessary?
If the patch comes from Lucene, then I'd use their new version number, as
usual. If it's a PyLucene fix, its version would go from 3.3-1 to 3.3-2.
An
Without the third 0, how will you version critical patch releases should
they be necessary?
On 07/02/2011 09:13 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Jul 2, 2011, at 13:58, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 01.07.2011 14:24, schrieb Andi Vajda:
The PyLucene 3.3.0-1 release closely tracking the recent release o
On Jul 2, 2011, at 13:58, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 01.07.2011 14:24, schrieb Andi Vajda:
>>
>> The PyLucene 3.3.0-1 release closely tracking the recent release of Lucene
>> Java 3.3 is ready.
>>
>> A release candidate is available from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>>
Am 01.07.2011 14:24, schrieb Andi Vajda:
>
> The PyLucene 3.3.0-1 release closely tracking the recent release of Lucene
> Java 3.3 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
>
> A list of changes in this release can be seen at:
> http://s
The PyLucene 3.3.0-1 release closely tracking the recent release of Lucene
Java 3.3 is ready.
A release candidate is available from:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
A list of changes in this release can be seen at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/pylucene/branches/pylucene_
11 matches
Mail list logo