+1
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024, 7:47 PM Laurent Jakubina
wrote:
> +1
>
> Le mer. 16 oct. 2024 à 18:26, Andi Vajda a écrit :
>
> >
> > The PyLucene 10.0.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> > Apache Lucene 10.0.0 is ready.
> >
> > A release candidate is available from:
> > https://dist.
+1
Side question: is it easy to tell from the version numbers when reindexing
is required?
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 5:48 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.12.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.12.0 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https:
My excuse is I'm increasingly bad at reading email. Still using. Still
encouraging.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:32 PM Aric Coady wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
> > Of course anyone can vote !
> > Anyone interested in this project can and should vote !
> > If no one does,
+1
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:51 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.10.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.10.0 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.10.0-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 9.10.0 is bu
+1
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:39 PM Benjamin Trent wrote:
> +1
>
> I tested getting ann-benchmarks updated and it worked just fine. Was also
> able to build locally and run some tests (non-exhaustive) on my M1 macbook.
>
> Hope everyone else has the same success!
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 3:47 AM
+1
On Mon, May 29, 2023, 4:44 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.6.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.6.0 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.6.0-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 9.6.0 is built wi
+1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 3:50 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 9.4.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 9.4.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.4.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 9.4.1 is built wi
+1
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The rc1 vote failed because of a bug fix in JCC that helps with detecting
> the Temurin JDK - available from https://adoptium.net.
> IIUC, the Temurin JDK supercedes AdoptOpenJDK.
>
> Please vote on PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2 instead. These relea
+1
+1
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 8.8.1 is built wit
+1
+1
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 5:17 PM Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc2) release tracking the recent release of
> Apache Lucene 8.1.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.1.1-rc2/
>
> PyLucene 8.1.1 is built wit
+1
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 11:27 PM Marc Jeurissen
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Marc Jeurissen
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01D3F728.E95A0620]
>
> Bibliotheek UAntwerpen
> Stadscampus – Ve35.303
> Venusstraat 35 – 2000 Antwerpen
> marc.jeuris...@uantwerpen.be
> T +32 3 265 49 71
> JCC monkeypatches as needed.
I don't think monkey patching worked on Ubuntu 18.04, for any version of
JCC that I tried. When running make, I ran into errors discussing how JCC
was not built with shared support.
> Does Lucene 4 even build and run with Java 11 ?
No idea. I halted my efforts once
I'd previously been using 4.9.0. Making a huge jump in release numbers is
scary. Will it invalidate existing indexes? Has the Lucene API changed a
lot?
Will I be forced to migrate to python 3? That said, I was desperate and
tried
all the official releases (4.10.1, 6.2.0, 6.4.1, 6.5.0). It just so
h
Hi Andi,
I am happy to report that I just got 4.10.1 working, using some
extreme measures. Whew. Will give a clearer report after getting
some sleep.
Jeff
+1
On Dec 21, 2017 4:50 AM, "Andi Vajda" wrote:
The PyLucene 7.2.0 (rc1) release tracking the upcoming release of
Apache Lucene 7.2.0 is ready.
A release candidate is available from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/7.2.0-rc1/
PyLucene 7.2.0 is built with JCC 3.1 inclu
+1.00 ± 0.01
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> A few fixes were needed in JCC for better Windows support.
> The PyLucene 6.5.0 rc1 vote is thus cancelled.
>
> I'm now calling for a vote on PyLucene 6.5.0 rc2.
>
> The PyLucene 6.5.0 (rc2) release tracking the recent release
+1
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> The PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1) release tracking today's release of
> Apache Lucene 6.4.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/6.4.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 6.4.1 is built with
+1
[x] I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases
With emphasis on the "happy" part. Not meant to be discouraging in any way.
+1 (from a user)
I don't understand this. Lucene is the dominant open source
search software, and Python continues to gain popularity.
Why is there a decline in interest?
Sounds like we are all members of the "no idea how to do it" club.
Does it make sense to add a multithreaded indexing
example to the samples directory? Michael McCandless
makes such fun graphs, and it would be fun to chase
them in python.
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/05/265-indexing-speedup-with-lucenes.html
Does it make sense to add a multithreaded indexing example to the
samples directory? Mike McCandles has such fun graphs, and it would be
fun to chase them in python.
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/05/265-indexing-speedup-with-lucenes.html
26 matches
Mail list logo
